Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18406/2026 of NIMMAGADDA RAJYA LAKSHMI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 10 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI WRIT PETITION NO: 18406 OF 2026 Between: 1. NIMMAGADDA RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/o

APHC010345852026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. NIMMAGADDA RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/o Venkatesh, aged about 25 years, Hindu, residing at D.No.10-23/1, 14th Mile, Lemalle Village, Amaravathi Mandal, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary TO Government Home Department, A.P Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P

2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District Andhra Pradesh - 522 503

3. The Superintendent of Police, Collector Office Road, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522 004

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Collector Office Road, Guntur District Andhra Pradesh - 522 006

5. The Station House Officer, Vatticherukuru, Guntur District Andhra Pradesh

- 522 212.

6. Sri Korrapati Rambabu, S/o Seshagiri Rao @ Koteswara Rao, Age about 55 years, R/o. Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District Andhra Pradesh - 522 017.

7. Sri Thalluri Kantha Rao, S/o. Sivaiah, AgE 50 years, R/o. Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District Andhra Pradesh - 522 017.

8. Sri Koppaka Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Ramaiah, Age.60 years, R/o. Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522 017.

9. Sri Parvathaneni Sivaiah, S/o. Ramaiah, Age.62 years, R/o. Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522 017.

10. Sri Korrapati Pushpavathi, W/o. Sivaiah Age.55 years, R/o. Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522 017.

11. Sri Korrapati Ramesh Babu, S/o. Govindha Rao, Age.52 years, R/o. Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522 017.

12. Sri Manchineni Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Age.40 years R/o. Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522 017

13. Sri Nalluri Samba Siva Rao, S/o. Maheshwara Rao, Age.48 years, R/o. Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522 017 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents, especially Respondent Nos.1 to 5, to forthwith trace, secure and produce the detenues, namely a) Smt. Nirnmagadda Dhana Lakshmi, W/o. Sri

Nimmagadda Srinivasa Rao, aged about 46 years and b) Sri Nimmagadda Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Venkateswarlu, aged about 52 years. both residents of D.No.2-70, Palapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, before this Hon'ble Court, by calling for the records, if any, relating to their apprehension, detention or custody, and upon such production, declare that their detention, if found to be by or at the instance of the respondent authorities, is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and without authority of law, and consequently direct their immediate release, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased be pleased to Direct the Respondent Authorities to produce the detenues. namely; a) Smt. Nimmagadda Dhana Lakshmi, W/o. Sri Nimmagadda Srinivasa Rao, aged about 46 years; and b) Sri Nimmagadda Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Venkateswarlu, aged about 52 years; both residents of D.No.2- 70, Pallapadu Village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, before this Hon'ble Court, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SARIPUDI RAJA MOULI Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order:

ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)

Heard Sri S. Rajamouli, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri J.Krishna Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. The writ petition of Habeas Corpus has been filed on the allegation that the detenues were in illegal custody of unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 13 along with police officials.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that counter has been filed. As per the counter affidavit the detenues were never detained by the police officials or with their assistance.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenues have been released and they are no more in any illegal detention. Memo to that effect has also been filed vide USR.No.89832 of 2026 dated 10.08.2026. In para-2 of the memo it has been stated that the detenues has been released by respondent Nos.6 to 13 with the support of official respondent Nos.1 to 5.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader disputed the same by saying that official respondents are not concerned with the alleged detention.

6. We are not entering into the dispute with respect to the detention by the official respondents or not. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the detenues are now set free and they are at liberty, the writ petition is dismissed recording the said submission.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J

_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J

Dated: 11.08.2026 AG

Dated: 11.08.2026 AG

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead