Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/4116/2023 of BETHAMCHERLA DURGA PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF AP on 10 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4116/2023 Between: Bethamcherla Durga Prasad ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others

APHC010083112023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 4116/2023

Between:

Bethamcherla Durga Prasad

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Ap and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. BATHALA RAMESH The Court made the following order:

Aggrieved by non-consideration of the representation dated 20.01.2023 seeking mutation of names in the revenue records with respect to subject property to an extent of Ac.1.97 cents in Sy.No.189/2B2C7 situated in Thimmayapalem village, Vinukonda mandal, Palnadu district, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Heard Sri GVS Mehar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

3. Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue upon instructions of Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsaraopet dated 09.07.2026 submitted that, the authorities have already issued an endorsement vide Rc.No.1217/2026-G dated 04.07.2026 on the petitioner’s representation dated 20.01.2023, therefore there remains nothing for adjudication in this writ petition and accordingly prayed to dismiss the writ petition.

4. A perusal of the instructions placed on record dated 09.07.2026 would indicate that the authorities have already issued an endorsement vide Rc.No.1217/2026-G dated 04.07.2026 on the petitioner’s representation dated 20.01.2023. If the petitioner has any grievance against the said endorsement, he/she can always question the same before appropriate authority in accordance with law. In view of the same, there remains nothing for adjudication in this writ petition and the same is liable to be closed.

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead