Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6870/2023 of ALAMURI VIJAYAKUMARI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 10 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6870/2023 Between: Alamuri Vijayakumari ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others
APHC010134192023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6870/2023
Between:
Alamuri Vijayakumari
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Ap and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
Aggrieved by non-consideration of the petitioner’s representations dated 27.02.2023 & 01.03.2023, the present writ petition is filed.
2. Heard Sri Chakravarthy, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
3. Sri Chakravarthy, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue while placing reliance on the counter filed by the Tahsildar, Undi mandal submitted that, the 3rd respondent has already issued an endorsement dated 13.04.2023 on the petitioner’s representations, therefore there remains nothing for adjudication in this writ petition and accordingly prayed to dismiss the writ petition.
5. When the matter is pending consideration, the parties should invariably be in touch with their respective counsel for adjudication of the matter, failing which; it can be considered that the parties have no interest in prosecuting the same. Since the matter is of the year 2023 and as the counter would indicate that the authorities have already issued an endorsement dated 13.04.2023 on the petitioner’s representations, there remains nothing for adjudication in this writ petition and the same is liable to be closed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS