Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/20953/2023 of KADEM NAGENDRAMMA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PARDESH on 10 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20953/2023 Between: Kadem Nagendramma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra
APHC010405202023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 20953/2023
Between:
Kadem Nagendramma and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pardesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KOLLURI ARJUN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
Aggrieved by the action of the respondent authorities in contemplating to lay the road through petitioners agricultural lands covered by Sy.Nos.159, 160-2 & 160-1 situated in Konakanamitla village and mandal, Praksam district, the present writ petition is filed.
2. Heard Sri N.Krishna Sai, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
3. Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue upon instructions of Tahsildar, Konakanamitla mandal dated 13.07.2026 submitted that, the authorities have already issued resumption orders dated 22.01.2026 with regard to the subject properties.
4. To the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioners sought liberty to question the said resumption proceedings.
5. Since the authorities have already passed resumption orders dated 22.01.2026 with regard to the subject properties and the petitioners have an intention to avail other alternative remedy available to them, there remains nothing for adjudication and the writ petition is liable to be closed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. However the petitioners are at liberty to avail other alternative remedy available to them in accordance with law. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS