Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23047/2025 of RUDVIK ENGINEERING WORKS Vs THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS on 10 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 23047/2025 Between: 1. RUDVIK ENGINEERING WORKS, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. S.RAMAMURTHY, S/O. S.VENKATARAMAIAH
APHC010443632025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 23047/2025
Between:
1. RUDVIK ENGINEERING WORKS, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR
SRI. S.RAMAMURTHY, S/O. S.VENKATARAMAIAH AGED 59
YEARS OFFICE AT H.NO. 10-81/18, MARUTHI NAGAR, TIRUPATHI.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, REP BY ITS DY.
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (M-1) TIRUMALA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
2. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, REP BY ITS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (V) TIRUMALA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
3. MR T V SATYANARAYANA CHIEF ENGINEER, THE TIRUMALA
TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS TIRUMALA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in issuing impugned notice ROC No.
07/Dy.EE(M-l)/TTD/TML/2025, dated 12.08.2025 wherein the petitioner is being compelled to use MIX GUARD HR5 of chemicals inconsonant with the terms and specifications under agreement No. 12/S.E.-11/2025-26
dated 20.05.2025, and without considering petitioner representations,
dated 07.08.2025 and 11.08.2025 with regard to usage of Armstrong Chemicals which are approved by the respondent authorities under the TTD Schedule of Rates (SOR) 2023-2024 as illegal, arbitrary, mala fide, unreasonable, uneonstitutional and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently to set aside the impugned notice ROC No. and to Direct the07/Dy.EE(M-l)/TTD/TML/2025, dated 12.08.2025 respondents to consider and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to suspend the impugned ROC No. 07/Dy.EE(M-
l)/TTD/TML/2025, dated 12.08.2025 by allowing the petitioner staff to perform their work by using Armstrong Chemical products which conform to equivalent specifications as required by the respondents, in accordance with the TTD Schedule of Rates (SOR) 2023-2024 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BALAIAH B
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. NVS PRASADA VARMA
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.23047 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a letter, dated 03.08.2026 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. No order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 11.08.2026 chs
WRIT PETITION No.23047 of 2025 Dated: 11.08.2026
chs