WP/3397/2026 of KALVAPALLI VISALAKSHI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 August 2026

1. KALVAPALLI VISALAKSHI, D/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGE 46 YEARS, WORKING AS CONTRACT RESIDENTIAL TEACHER (CRT) SOCIAL STUDIES, KASTURBA GANDHI BALIKA VIDYALAYAM,

MAKAVARIPALEM, MAKAVARIPALEM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (531113)

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (522237)

2. THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, B-BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA. (520001)

3. THE SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR PATAMATA, Z.P.H.S. BUILDING, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. (520001)

4. KATURBA GANDHI BALIKA VIDYALAYA SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SAMAGRA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, PATAMATA, Z.P. HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. (520001)

5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORCUMCHAIRMAN, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (530001)

6. THE PROJECT OFFICER, SARVASIKSHA ABIHYAN, VISAKAHAPATNAM, VISAKAHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (530001)

7. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER AND EXOFFICIO PROJECT COORDINATOR, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, VISAKAHAPATNAM, VISAKAHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (530001)

8. THE GIRL CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFIFCER, KASTURBA GANDHI BALIKA VIDYALAYA,

VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKAHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (530001)

9. THE SPECIAL OFFICER / PRINCIPAL, KATURBA GANDHI BALIKA VIDYALAYA, KASIMKOTA, KASIMKOTA MANDAL, VISAKAHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (530001)

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased top issue an order or a direction or a writ particularly a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents to discontinue or disrupt the services of the petitioner i.e., PGT Telugu contrary to the object in the establishing the Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalays in June 2023 by respondents as illegal, arbitrary unceremonious unfair contrary to the procedure established under law violating the principles of natural justice opposing the terms and conditions of the contract of employment entered in between petitioner and her respective Project Officer / Respondents violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioner services in to the regular basis at the place of the petitioner, i.e., KGBV Munagapaka, Vishakhapatnam District (Now Anakapalli District) is engaged and for all these years. By providing all the service benefits thereof coupled with payment of salarites regulairly to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents to absorb the petitioner services in to the regular basis at the place of the petitioner, i.e., KGBV Munagapaka, Vishakhapatnam District (Now Anakapalli District) is engaged and for all these years, by providing all the service benefits thereof coupled with payment of salaries regulalrly to the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SALIKITI KARUNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. RAGHU BABU KALAMATA SC For Samagra Siksha

2. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following:

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.3397 of 2026 O R DE R:

Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the issue in the Department.

2. Permission as sought for is accorded.

3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 10.08.2026 KLP