Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/32478/2025 of Chimata Nageswaramma Vs UNION OF INDIA on 9 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 32478/2025 Between: 1. CHIMATA NAGESWARAMMA, W/O. LATE CHIMATA RAMA CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, ONGOLE R/O. D.NO.7-192, OPPOSITE SAI BABA TEMPLE, SINGARAYA
APHC010629192025
IN THE
MONDAY,
THE HONOURAB
WRIT
Between:
1. CHIMATA
NAGESW
CHANDRAIAH, AGED
R/O. D.NO.7-192, O
KONDA, PRAKASAM
2. P.GURAVAIAH, S/O
BUSINESS R/O D
ONGOLE PRAKASAM
1. UNION OF INDIA,
MINISTRY OF PET
BHAVAN, NEW DELH
2. THE INDIAN OIL COR
DIRECTOR REGD OF
EAST MUMBAI 40005
3. THE INDIAN OIL
DIRECTOR,
NARS
HYDERABAD, TELAN
4. THE INDIAN OIL C
DIVISIONAL RETAIL S
RING ROAD VIJAYAW
W.P.N
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THE 10th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA
T PETITION NO: 32478/2025
WARAMMA,
W/O.
LATE
CHIMATA
D ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,
OPPOSITE SAI BABA TEMPLE, SIN
M DISTRICT.
P. BALAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEA
NO 396341 3RD LANE GOPAL N
M DISTRICT
...PETIT
AND
REPRESENTED BY UNDER SEC
TROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS,
HI - 110 001.
RPORATION LIMITED, REP BY ITS M
FFICE AT G9 ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG
CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS EX
SAPUR
HOUSE,
HIMAYATH
NGANA STATE.
ORPORATION LIMITED, REP BY IT
SALES MANAGER 3RD FLOOR, GVR
WADA.
RC,J
No.32478 of 2025
H
ATI
A
RAMA
, ONGOLE
NGARAYA
ARS, OCC
NAGARAM
TIONER(S)
CRETARY,
SHASTRI
ANAGING
BANDRA
XECUTIVE
NAGAR,
TS CHIEF
TOWERS
RC,J
W.P.No.32478 of 2025
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 4 in not granting necessary permission to operate the Mamatha Agencies at Sy.No.500/H3, Singarayakonda, Prakasam District by providing equipments for operating the petroleum retail outlet as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent 2 to 4 to grant permission for operating the petroleum retail outlet by providing necessary equipment to operate the petroleum retail outlet at Sy.No.500/H3, Singarayakonda, Prakasam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to grant permission for operating the petroleum retail outlet by providing necessary equipments to operate the retail outlet at Sy.No.500/H3, Singarayakonda, Prakasam District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.K RAGHU VEER
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM
2.J U M V PRASAD (CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)
3.Y N LOHITA (SC FOR INDIAN OIL CORP )
The Court made the following:
RC,J
W.P.No.32478 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri K.Raghu Veer, learned counsel for petitioners, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no orders as to costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR 10TH August, 2026