Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/20332/2026 of G. Sarala Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 6 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20332/2026 Between: 1. G. SARALA, W/O VIDYA SAGAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. D.N0.1-15A. ARAI VILLAGE
APHC010376702026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 20332/2026
Between:
1. G. SARALA, W/O VIDYA SAGAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O.
D.N0.1-15A. ARAI VILLAGE K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.-522238
2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS HOFF, ANDHRA PRADESH FOREST DEPARTMENT, ARANYA BHAVAN, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. -522503
3. THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, CHITTOOR CIRCLE, TIRUPATI.
-517501
4. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, TIRUPATI FOREST DIVISION, TIRUPATI. -517501
5. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, K.V.B. PURAM FOREST RANGE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. -517501
6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. -517501
7. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTI DIVISION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. -517644
8. THE TAHSILDAR, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.- 517643
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAVI TEJA GUDE
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Forest Authorities in illegally digging trenches in the petition schedule DKT assigned land and attempting to take over the physical possession of the petition schedule property admeasuring Ac.4.72 cents in Sy.No.256 of Diguva Puttur Village, K.V.B. Puram Mandal, Tirupati District, without issuing any notice, without initiating any proceedings for cancellation of the original D-Form Patta, without resuming the assigned land in accordance with law and without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule property except in accordance with law.”
2. Heard Sri G.Ravi Teja, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Ms.Baliboyina Sravani, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests and Ms.K.Vijayeswari, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
3. Learned counsel representing both sides, in one voice, would submit that the Petitioner herein succeeded the property, since DKT patta was issued in favour of the maternal uncle of the Petitioner through which the Petitioner succeeded the property. It is submitted that pattadar passbook was also issued in the name of the Petitioner.
4. In the light of the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Respondents – Authorities to follow due process of law regarding the subject property. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.08.2026 Dinesh
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.20332 of 2026
Dt.07.08.2026
Dinesh