WP/11645/2024 of Mandapati Mukkayya, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 6 August 2026

1. Mandapati Mukkayya,, S/o Mandapati Satyanarayana, Age 68 years, resident of 1-3/1, Sai Baba temple street, Akkampeta, Jangareddigudem, West Godavari District-534447.

2. Mandapati Pothanna,, S/o Mandapati Satyanarayana, Age 67 years, Resident of H. No. 1-7, Akkampeta, Jangareddigudem, West Godavari District-534447.

3. Mandapati Mani Kumar,, S/o Mandapati Satyanarayana, Age 67 years, Resident of H. No. 1-5. Akkampeta, Jangareddigudem, West Godavari District-534447. ...Petitioners AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

2. The Special Deputy Collector, I.T.D.A, K.R. Puram, Eluru District.

3. The Special Deputy Tahsildar, Tribal Welfare, K. R. Puram, Eluru District.

4. The Tahsildar, (Akkampeta Village) Buttaigudem Mandal, Eluru District.

5. Mandapati Pardhasaradhi, S/o Late Ramachandra Rao, Resident of Akkampeta, Jangareddigudem, West Godavari District-534447.

6. Kovvasu Mukkayya, S/o Durga Rao, Resident of Marlagudem Village, Buttaigudem Mandal, Eluru District.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru District.

8. The Station House Officer, Buttaigudem Police Station, Eluru District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS in declaring action of the respondent no.2 in issuing the impugned Order dt. 07.03.2024, in SR No. 104/2024, against the petitioners' subject properties, situated at R.S No. 16, Marlagudem Village, Buttaigudem Mandal, Eluru District, which is violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of Indian and consequently, to set aside the impugned Order dt. 07.03.2024, in SR No.104/2024 issued by the respondent no.2, and (ii) to direct the respondent no.2, to conduct detailed enquiry in the presence of the writ petitioners and 5th respondent, regarding the subject property, total extent of Ac. 6.56 cents situated in R.S No. 16, Marlagudem Village, Buttaigudem Mandai, Eluru District, and (iii) to direct the respondent no.7 and 8 to provide police aid to the writ petitioners, to do cultivation in their agricultural lands, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend, the impugned Order dt. 07.03.2024 in SR No. 104/2024, issued by the 2nd respondent, till pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent, not to mutate the name of the 5th respondent in the revenue records, till pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: B V KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondents: VUYYURU LAKSHMANA RAO The Court made the following Order:

Sri Vijay Mathukumilli, learned counsel representing Sri B.V. Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

Dated: 07-08-2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 11645 OF 2024

Dated: 07-08-2026 MSI