Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2001/2026 of Jetti Prameela Rani Vs Peddi Radhakrishna Murthy Died on 6 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2001 OF 2026 Between: 1. Jetti Prameela Rani, D / o Peddi Radhakrishna Murthy W/o Jetti Venkateswara Prasad,Aged about 55 years, Occ Home Maker,R/o
APHC010368692026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2001 OF 2026
Between:
1. Jetti Prameela Rani, D / o Peddi Radhakrishna Murthy W/o Jetti Venkateswara Prasad,Aged about 55 years, Occ Home Maker,R/o D.
No. 8-3-167/D, Plot No. 123 and 125,Flat No. 301, Visista Apartment, Kalayan Nagar Venture,S.R. Nagar, Rangareddy, Hyderabad
2. Jetti Venkateswara Prasad, S/o Late Nageswara RaoAged about 58
years, Occ Business,R/o D. No. 8-3-167/D, Plot No. 123 and 125,Flat No. 301, Visista Apartment, Kalayan Nagar Venture,S.R. Nagar, Rangareddy, Hyderabad.
...Petitioners
AND
1. Peddi Radhakrishna Murthy Died, Peddi Radhakrishna Murthy Died
2. Peddi Sarath Chandra, S/o Late Srinivasa RaoAged about 27 years, Occ Student,R/o D. No. 1-155, Krishnayapalem,Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
3. Peddi Sambasiva Rao, S/o Peddi Radhakrisha Murthy, aged 63
years,Occ
Pvt
Employee,
R/o
D.
No.
1-155,Krishnayapalem,
Mangalagiri Mandal,Guntur District.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Aggrieved by the action of Learned Judge, III
Additional District and Sessions Judge at Guntur, in not taking up and deciding IA.No. 8 of 2023 in AS.No.275 of 2019 and not deciding the main appeal, the petitioners begs to prefer this revision under Art. 227
of The Constitution of India
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the learned Judge, III Additional District and Sessions Judge: at Guntur, to take up and decide I.A. No.
8 of 2023 in AS No. 275 of 2019 and also the decide the main appeal as expeditiously as possible, pending disposal of main C.R.P.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following order:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Civil Revision Petition is filed praying the Court to direct the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Guntur to take up and decide I.A.No.08/2023 in A.S.No.275/2019 and also to decide the main appeal expeditiously.
2. Initially the respondent no.3 herein filed a petition under Order XXII Rule 4 and under Section 151 CPC before the trial Court praying the Court to record that no legal representatives need be brought on record as the 1st respondent/1st defendant therein died on 11.8.2021 having executed an unregistered will dated 11.7.2021 in favour of the petitioner/appellant therein and the petitioner/appellant therein being already on record. As the said I.A. is dismissed, the parties have approached this Court and filed C.R.P.No.958 of 2024 and this Court considered the said Revision and disposed of vide order dated 18.02.2025 with the following directions: “In the result, the revision petition is allowed and the order and decree dated 23.02.2024 in I.A.No.08/2023 in A.S.No.275/2019 on the file of III Additional District Judge, Guntur is set aside and the matter is remanded giving liberty to the petitioner to implead in I.A.No.08/2023 the wife and daughter of the pre-deceased son by name Sri Peddi Srinivasa Rao, who are the other legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent and thereafter the appellate Court shall order notice to them, conduct enquiry on the un-registered will dated 11.7.2021 of the 1st respondent and pass order afresh.”
3. Even lapse of more than sixteen (16) months, the said I.A. has not been considered and disposed of. Hence the C.R.P.
4. Considering the submissions and also on perusal of the record, the learned III Additional District Judge, Guntur is directed to consider the said I.A. and decide the same in terms of the order passed by this Court as referred above, and if the parties cooperate, the main appeal also may be considered for expeditious disposal.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ appeal, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
07.8.2026 RD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2001 of 2026 07.8.2026 RD