Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/4833/2019 of G DEVAMMA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 6 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 4833/2019 Between: 1. G DEVAMMA, W/O G. NAGARAJU HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-111
APHC010107592019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 4833/2019
Between:
1. G DEVAMMA, W/O G. NAGARAJU HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS
R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-111 P.V.NARASIMHARAO NAGAR, KURNOOL
KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. N.JAYAMMA, W/O. N.PEDDASUNKANNA HINDU, AGED 56 YEARS
R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-78
P.V.NARASIMHARAO
NAGAR
KALLUR
MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH
3. REPALLENAGANNA, S/O. R.MADANNA HINDU, AGED 70 YEARS
R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-107 P.V.NARASIMHARAO NAGAR KALLUR
MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH
4. NAYAKAL. DEEVANAMMA, W/O. P.SOMANNA HINDU, AGED 50
YEARS,
R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-110
P.V.NARASIMHARAO
NAGAR
KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH
5. JAVAJI RAVIKUMAR, S/O J. RAMIREDDY HINDU, AGED 39YEARS
R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-113
P.V.NARASIMHARAO
NAGAR
KALLUR
MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL, AP
3. THE KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL
DISTRICT, AP REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER
4. THE KURNOOL AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP REP.BY ITS SECRETARY
5. THE TAHSILDAR, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA
PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamusdeclaring the action of the Respondent No.4
in trying to demolish the houses of the petitioners i.e. house bearing no's
1)H.No.51-952-5-111, 2) H.No.51-952-5-78, 3) H.No.51-952-5-107, 4)H.No.
51-952-5-110 and 5) H.No. 51.952-5-113. situated at P. V. Narasimharao Nagar, KallurMandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh without issuing any notice, without following due process of law or without giving any opportunity
of hearing to the petitioners asillegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Art.14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of Indiaand pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.4not to demolish the houses of the petitioners i.e.
house bearing no's: 1)H.No.51-952-5-111, 2) H.No.51-952-5-78, 3) H.No.51- 952-5-107, 4)H.No. 51-552-5-110 and 5) H.No. 51.952 5-113., situated at P.
V.
Narasimharao
Nagar,
KallurMandal,
Kurnool
District,
Andhra
Pradeshpending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SHANTHASREE ELIPE
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3. Standing Counsel For Agricultural Marketing Committees
4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.4833 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present writ petition is filed, aggrieved by the proposed action of respondent authorities in trying to demolish the petitioner’s property without following the due process of law.
2. This Court, by order dated 08.04.2019 granted interim direction as prayed for. Thereafter, the matter was listed today.
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the interim order passed by this Court. He further submits that, in the event any further action is required to be taken against the petitioner's property, the respondents shall strictly follow the due process of law.
4. Recording the said submission, the present writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the respondent authorities to proceed against the petitioner's property, if required, only by following the due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
WRIT PETITION No.4833 of 2019 Date: 07.08.2026
KGM