Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/4833/2019 of G DEVAMMA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 4833/2019 Between: 1. G DEVAMMA, W/O G. NAGARAJU HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-111

APHC010107592019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 4833/2019

Between:

1. G DEVAMMA, W/O G. NAGARAJU HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS

R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-111 P.V.NARASIMHARAO NAGAR, KURNOOL

KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. N.JAYAMMA, W/O. N.PEDDASUNKANNA HINDU, AGED 56 YEARS

R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-78

P.V.NARASIMHARAO

NAGAR

KALLUR

MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH

3. REPALLENAGANNA, S/O. R.MADANNA HINDU, AGED 70 YEARS

R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-107 P.V.NARASIMHARAO NAGAR KALLUR

MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH

4. NAYAKAL. DEEVANAMMA, W/O. P.SOMANNA HINDU, AGED 50

YEARS,

R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-110

P.V.NARASIMHARAO

NAGAR

KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH

5. JAVAJI RAVIKUMAR, S/O J. RAMIREDDY HINDU, AGED 39YEARS

R/O.H.NO.51-952-5-113

P.V.NARASIMHARAO

NAGAR

KALLUR

MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL, AP

3. THE KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL

DISTRICT, AP REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER

4. THE KURNOOL AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP REP.BY ITS SECRETARY

5. THE TAHSILDAR, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ANDHRA

PRADESH

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamusdeclaring the action of the Respondent No.4

in trying to demolish the houses of the petitioners i.e. house bearing no's

1)H.No.51-952-5-111, 2) H.No.51-952-5-78, 3) H.No.51-952-5-107, 4)H.No.

51-952-5-110 and 5) H.No. 51.952-5-113. situated at P. V. Narasimharao Nagar, KallurMandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh without issuing any notice, without following due process of law or without giving any opportunity

of hearing to the petitioners asillegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Art.14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of Indiaand pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.4not to demolish the houses of the petitioners i.e.

house bearing no's: 1)H.No.51-952-5-111, 2) H.No.51-952-5-78, 3) H.No.51- 952-5-107, 4)H.No. 51-552-5-110 and 5) H.No. 51.952 5-113., situated at P.

V.

Narasimharao

Nagar,

KallurMandal,

Kurnool

District,

Andhra

Pradeshpending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. SHANTHASREE ELIPE

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In

2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

3. Standing Counsel For Agricultural Marketing Committees

4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.4833 of 2019

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present writ petition is filed, aggrieved by the proposed action of respondent authorities in trying to demolish the petitioner’s property without following the due process of law.

2. This Court, by order dated 08.04.2019 granted interim direction as prayed for. Thereafter, the matter was listed today.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the interim order passed by this Court. He further submits that, in the event any further action is required to be taken against the petitioner's property, the respondents shall strictly follow the due process of law.

4. Recording the said submission, the present writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the respondent authorities to proceed against the petitioner's property, if required, only by following the due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.

5. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

WRIT PETITION No.4833 of 2019 Date: 07.08.2026

KGM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead