Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1893/2026 of Chilaka Solomon Raju, Vs P.Harsha Vardhan Raju, on 6 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1893/2026 Between: 1. CHILAKA SOLOMON RAJU,, SON OF MOSES, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION DIRECTOR, SOCIO ECONOMIC
APHC010198802026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1893/2026
Between:
1. CHILAKA SOLOMON RAJU,, SON OF MOSES, AGED ABOUT 60
YEARS,
OCCUPATION
DIRECTOR,
SOCIO
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT,
SAMVESAM
TELUGU
BAPTIST
CHURCH (S.I.B), A RESIDENT OF 1-20-3D- 58C, BHAGATH SINGH
COLONY, MARKAPURAM, MARKAPURAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. P HARSHA VARDHAN RAJU, SON OF NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT
42 YEARS, OCCUPATION THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF
POLICE, MARKAPURAM MARKAPURAM DISTRICT.
2. K RAJA MOHAN RAO, SON OF NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 42
YEARS OCCUPATION. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARKAPURAM POLICE STATION MARKAPURAM DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents, including imprisonment and fine the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, for their willful disobedience in implementing of the order of this Honble Court dated 16/06/2025 in W. P. 13687 OF 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BASHEER AHMED
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RASIDHAR LANKA
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.1893 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.13687 of 2025, dated 16.06.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.1893 of 2026 Date: 07.08.2026
KGM