Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1180/2026 of K UMA SANKAR Vs P VISWANATHA on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1180/2026 Between: 1. K UMA SANKAR, S/O SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 63YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S ARCHANA SOUNDS ELECTRICAL

APHC010132772026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1180/2026

Between:

1. K UMA SANKAR, S/O SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 63YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S ARCHANA SOUNDS ELECTRICAL WORKS, BESIDE PRASAD SUPPLIERS, OPP. RAJ TALKIES, RAILWAY

STATION ROAD, KURNOOL - 518001.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. P VISWANATHA, , The Municipal Commissioner, Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh -518001.

...CONTEMNOR

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent for wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order passed in W.P. No. 140 of 2026, in accordance with sections 10 and 12 of the contempt of courts Act -1971, in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent to immediately comply with the order passed in W.P. No. 140 of 2026 by releasing the admitted amount payable to the petitioner, in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VEERAVALLI VENKATA RAVI KUMAR

Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In The Court made the following:

CONTEMPT CASE No.1180 OF 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.140 of 2026, dated 08.01.2026 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.

3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:07.08.2026 CMK

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1180/2026

Date : 07.08.2026 CMK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead