Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/10821/2026 of K SRINIVASA REDDY AND CO Vs THE STATE OF AP on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 10821 OF 2026 Between: 1. K SRINIVASA REDDY AND CO, O/o. Firm No.85 of 2000, D.No.3/241-1, Prakash Nagar, Proddatur

APHC010201472026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. K SRINIVASA REDDY AND CO, O/o. Firm No.85 of 2000, D.No.3/241-1, Prakash Nagar, Proddatur Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District Rep by its Managing Partner K. Sreenivasa Reddy S/o.K.C.Venkata Subba Reddy, Aged about 61 Years, R/o.D.No.3/241-1, Prakash Nagar, YMR Colony, Proddatur-516360, YSR (Kadapa) District ...Petitioner AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District- 522503

2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District-522503

3. The Andhra Pradesh Center for Financial Systems and Services APCFSS, Rep. by its MD and CEO, Government of Andhra Pradesh, 6th Floor, C- Block, Anjaneya Towers, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District - 521456

4. The Commissioner and Director of Agricultural Marketing, Mirchi Market Yard, Old Guntur, Guntur District-522004

5. The Directorate of Animal Husbandry, NTR Veterinary Hospital Premises, Labbipet, Vijayawada-520010

6. The Executive Engineer, Agricultural Marketing, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District-516001 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders or direction or a writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the admitted gross amounts of Rs. 11,03,292-00 (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Three Thousand Two Hundred Ninety Two Only) due to the petitioner as per the Agreement vide No. 11/2022-23, dated 18.05.2022 as illegal. arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice and in violation of the Art 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to make the payment of an amount of Rs. 11,03,292-00 forthwith along with an interest of 24 percent p.a and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to immediately pay an amount of Rs. 11,03,292-00 to the petitioner pending disposal of this writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following Order:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Animal Husbandry appearing for the respondents.

2. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not releasing the admitted sums of Rs.11,03,292/- due to the petitioner, in terms of the agreement entered into with the respondents the instant writ petition has been filed.

3. When the matter has been taken up for consideration today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Animal Husbandry appearing for the respondents has placed before the Court a copy of instructions received by him in the case. From the same it reflects that the respondents have admitted that an amount of Rs.11,03,292/- as due and payable by the 6th respondent to the petitioner. However, as the RIDF–XXIII tranche was closed on 31.12.2023 Therefore,the final bill of Rs.11,03,292/- payable to the petitioner, was not paid.

4. Having regard to the above, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondents to release the amounts that are due to the petitioner within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of the order.

5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 07-08-2026 MSI

Dated: 07-08-2026 MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead