Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/644/2015 of SHAIK GURAZALA KASIM, GUNTUR DT., Vs SHAIK GURAZALA BEE JOHNBEE, GUNTUR & ANR, REP PP., on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : - Date of pronouncement :07.08.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010655282015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 644 OF 2015 AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE (SR)

Date of reserved for orders : -

Date of pronouncement :07.08.2026

Date of uploading :

APHC010655282015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 644 OF 2015

AND

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE (SR) No.13266 OF 2015

CRL.R.C. NO: 644 OF 2015

Between:

Shaik Gurazala Kasim, S/o.Ameeana Saheb, Aged about 56 years, Cultivation, R/o Janapadu Village, Piduguralla Mandal, Guntur district. ...Petitioner

AND

1. Shaik Gurazala bee Johnbee, W/o.Kasim Saheb, Aged about 51 years, House wife, R/o.Janapadu Village, Piduguralla mandal, Guntur District.

2.The State of Andhra Pradesh,

rep. By its Public Prosecutor,

High Court Judicature at Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE (SR) No: 13266/2015

Between:

Shaik Gurazala Kasim, S/o.Ameeana Saheb, Aged about 56 years, Cultivation, R/o.Janapadu Village, Piduguralla Mandal, Guntur district.

...Petitioner

AND

1. Shaik Gurazala bee Johnbee, W/o.Kasim Saheb, Aged about 51 years, House wife, R/o.Janapadu Village, Piduguralla mandal, Guntur District.

2.The State of Andhra Pradesh,

rep. By its Public Prosecutor,

High Court Judicature at Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 644 OF 2015

AND

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE (SR) No.13266 OF 2015

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner and respondent No.1.

2. Both the counsel submitted that both parties amicably settled the matter out of Court and there are no other disputes between them, as such these cases may be dismissed.

3. Recorded the said submission.

4. In view of the settlement between the parties, these Criminal Revision cases are dismissed.

As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J

07.08.2026 knl

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead