Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2112/2026 of DARABATTULA NAGARAJU Vs SRI CHALLA SRINIVASULU SETTY on 5 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3601] THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2112/2026 Between: 1. DARABATTULA NAGARAJU, S/O
APHC010303172026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2112/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. DARABATTULA NAGARAJU, S/O MAHANKALI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O D.NO.5-37, RAYALAM THOTA, NEAR NO.2 ELEMNTARY SCHOOL RAYALAM (RURAL), BHIMAVARAM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI CHALLA SRINIVASULU SETTY, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED - MAJOR, DESIGNATION CHAIRMAN 86 MANAGING DIRECTOR STATE BANK BHAVAN, MADAME CAMA MARG, MUMBAI - 400 021 REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN 86 MANAGING DIRECTOR
2. SRI B V RANGADHAM, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED - MAJOR, DESIGNATION ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER 86 AUTHORISED OFFICER STESSED ASSETS MANAGEMENT BRANCH-LL THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, H.NO.3-4-1013,/A. NEW BUS STATION DT FLOOR, COMUPTER AMENITY CENTRE, TSRTC, KACHIGUDA HYDERABAD,TELANGANASTATE - 500 027
3. SRI A V R MURTHY, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED - MAJOR, DESIGNATION DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER STESSED ASSETS MANAGEMENT BRANCH-11 STATE BANK OF INDIA , KACHIGUDA, HYDERABAD TELANGANA STATE - 500 027 (PRESENTLY, H.NO.6- 2-915
REAR BLOCK,
FLOOR, HMWSSB COMOUND
KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500 004
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the respondents/contemnors for their wilful disobedience and deliverable defiance to the orders dated 23- 04-2026 passed in W.P No.22598 of 2024 (common orders in W.P No.22598 of 2024 and W.P No.22496 of 2024), and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. LEO LAW ASSOCIATES LLP Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY
2. The Court made the following Order:
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2112 OF 2026 ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
Sri G. Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the contempt petitioner appearing on behalf of M/s. Leo Law Associates submits that the order of the Writ Court has been complied with.
2. Sri S. Satyanarayana Moorthy, learned counsel for the respondents also submits the same.
3. Recording the aforesaid submissions made by the respective learned counsels, there is no need to proceed further in the Contempt Case and the same is closed.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J
Dated: 06.08.2026 KPV
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2112/2026
Dated: 06.08.2026 KPV