Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/35418/2025 of Alluri Venugopal Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 5 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 35418 OF 2025 Between: 1. Alluri Venugopal, S/o Late Malakondaiah, Aged 39 years, occ- Conductor, E. 627111, O/o. the

APHC010689462025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 35418 OF 2025

Between:

1. Alluri Venugopal, S/o Late Malakondaiah, Aged 39 years, occ- Conductor, E. 627111, O/o. the Depot Manager, A.PS.R.TC., Kanigiri, Prakasam District. R/o. D.No. 3-84-8, East Kodigudlapadu Village Pamuru Mandal, Prakasam District

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport and Roads and Building Department Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

2. The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director cum Vice-chairman, Pandit Nehru Bus Station, Vijayawada.

3. The District Public Transport Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District.

4. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Kanigiri Depot Prakasam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court

may be pleased topleased to Issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in issuing the charge sheet No.p1/01(09)/2025 -KNG

dated 11.11.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of G.O.Ms.No.26 dated 11.05.2023 and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and accordingly set aside charge sheet No.p1/01(09)/2025 -KNG dated 11.11.2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings arising out of the charge sheet No.p1/01 (09)72025 -KNG dated 11.11.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: P VENKATA RAO SC For APSRTC

Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR SERVICES II

The Court made the following order:

WRIT PETITION No.35418 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a Memo, dated 04.08.2026, seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. No order as to costs.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Date: 06.08.2026 SM

WRIT PETITION No.35418 of 2025 Dated: 06.08.2026

SM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead