Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1075/2015 of Chilakala Balaji, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 August 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 05.08.2026 Date of uploading : 05.08.2026 APHC010066502015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1075 OF 2015 Between: 1.
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 05.08.2026
Date of uploading : 05.08.2026
APHC010066502015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1075 OF 2015
Between:
1. Chilakala Balaji,, S/o. Late C. Gurappa, Aged 45 years, Occ: Prop. Marallee Agencies, R/o. D.No.7-108, Main Road, Near Bus Stand, R.S. Rangapurani, Bethamcherla, 4th Floor. Plot No.408, Sai Jyothi Towers, SBI Colony, Nandyal Town, Kurnool District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, For the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh
2. Regadi Bheema Reddy, S/o. R. Nagi Reddy, Aged 38 years, Opp: Seshi Reddy High School, Main Road, Bethamcherla Village & Mandal, Kurnool District.
3. Naven, age 38 years, Managing Director of Leo Mining Company, Bethameherla Village and Mandal, Kurnool District.
4. Mule Rama Mohan Reddy, aged 38 years, Permanent R/o. Pedda Kottala Village, Nandyal Mandal, working as incharge of Office Manager of Leo Mining Company, R/o. Revenue Quarters, Near Polytechnic College, Nandyal Town, Kurnool District.
5. Thapala Nagabhushanam, age 55 years, S/o. T. Tirupelu, Mine Raising contractor, Bethamcherla Village and Mandal, Kurnool District.
6. Joseph, aged 58 years, Mine Rasing Contrator, Bethaincherla Village and mandal, Kurnool District. (R2 to R6 are herein not necessary parties herein)
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. B S REDDY
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1075 OF 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Today also there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. On 22.07.2026, this Court directed the revision petitioner to appear for advancing arguments and the same is not complied with. It shows that the revision petitioner has no interest to prosecute this case. As seen from the record, revision petitioner has filed this Criminal Revision Case assailing the order dated 06.05.2015 passed in C.F.R. No.1465 of 2015 in Crime No.117 of 2012 by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone, Kurnool District but not against the conviction judgment. So, this Criminal Revision Case can be dismissed for non-prosecution as it is not filed against the conviction judgment of trial Court. In the result, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non- prosecution.
As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J
05.08.2026 knl