Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/11628/2023 of KATIKA VALI BASHA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 4 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

APHC010220322023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11628/2023 Between: 1. KATIKA VALI BASHA, S/O. KATIKA KRISHNAJI RAO, AGED

HN, J

W.P.No.11628_2023

APHC010220322023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 11628/2023

Between:

1. KATIKA VALI BASHA, S/O. KATIKA KRISHNAJI RAO, AGED ABOUT

24 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS (BUTCHER), R/O.D.NO.348M-20-G, ARORA NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.

2. THE KURNOOL

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP., BY ITS

MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, BUDHWARPETA MAIN ROAD, NR

PETA, KURNOOL.

3. THE COMMISSIONER, THE KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

BUDHWARPETA MAIN ROAD, NR PETA, KURNOOL.

4. THE TOWN CITY PLANNING OFFICER, THE KURNOOL MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION

BUDHWARPETA

MAIN

ROAD,

NR

PETA,

KURNOOL.

5. RAJENDRA PRASAD BABU, S/O. DEVANNA AGED UNKNOWN

YEARS, OCC. UNKNOWN R/O.D.NO.50-348-M3 ARORA NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT

6. DEVA, S/O. DEVANNA AGED UNKNOWN YEARS, OCC. UNKNOWN

R/O.D.NO.50-348-M3

ARORA

NAGAR,

KURNOOL

CITY

AND

DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an appropriate Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents No.2 to 4

in trying to demolish the Chicken Shop (Temporary Shack) in the name and style of Kiran Chicken Center' located at 100 Feet Road, B-Camp, Arora Nagar, Kurnool City and District, belonging to the petitioner, at the instance of

HN, J

W.P.No.11628_2023

respondents 5 and 6 without issuing any notice or proceedings under Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 eventhough the petitioner have a valid trade license under Section 403 and 624 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 and Street Vendors Act, 2014 apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles, 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to demolish the Chicken Shop (Temporary Shack) in the name and style of Kiran Chicken Center' located at 100 Feet Road, B-Camp, Arora Nagar, Kurnool City and District without following the due process law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No.2 to 4 not to demolish the Chicken Shop (Temporary Shack) in the name and style of `Kiran Chicken Center' located at 100 Feet Road, B-Camp, Arora Nagar, Kurnool City, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In

2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

3. G M SWAMULU

HN, J

W.P.No.11628_2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the proposed action of the respondent authorities in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the shop of the petitioner, which is a temporary shack located at 100 feet road, B-Camp, Arora Nagar, Kurnool City and District.

2. This Court, vide order dated 03.05.2026, directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner except by following due process of law.

3. The learned Standing counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 4 submits that the petitioner is conducting business by setting up a temporary shack by encroaching upon the subject property.

4. Be th at as it may, the writ petition is disposed off, directing the respondent authorities to follow due process of law in the event they intend to take any action against the subject shop of the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:05.08.2026 NKA

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HN, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 11628 of 2023 Date: 05.08.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead