Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/18375/2026 of YADLAPALLI PRIYANKA Vs Union of India on 4 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 5 PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18375/2026 Between: 1. YADLAPALLI PRIYANKA, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO.304, MYHOME APARTMENTS,
APHC010343722026
IN THE H
(
WEDNESDA
PRESENT:THE HONOU
WRIT
Between:
1. YADLAPALLI PRIYAN
YEARS, OCC H
APARTMENTS, CHA
2. YADLAPALLI DURG
ABOUT 17 YEARS,
SMT. YADLAPALLI
APARTMENTS, CHA
1. UNION OF INDIA,
SECRETARY
TO
DEPARTMENT, SAST
2. CENTRAL BOARD
CONTROLLER
OF
COMPLEX, SECTOR
110077.
3. CENTRAL BOARD
REGIONAL OFFICER
FLOORS, STALIN C
HOTEL, GOVERNOR
4. AP STATE COUNCI
SECRETARY, 2 TO
NAGAR,
6T
B
MANGALAGIRI, GUNT
5. APEAPCET
2026,
TECHNOLOGY UNIV
BUILDING, KAKINAD
W.P.N
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
URABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMA
T PETITION NO: 18375/2026
NKA, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED A
OUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO.304,
ANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR.
A MANI KARTHIK,, S/O PRIYANK
REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN,
PRIYANKA R/O FLAT NO.304, M
ANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR.
...PETIT
AND
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, REP
GOVERNMENT
OF
INDIA,
ED
TRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-11000
OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,
EXAMINATION,
INTEGRATED
R - 23, PHASE - I, DWARAKA, NEW
OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,
R, REGIONAL OFFICE, SECOND AN
CENTRE, MG ROAD, BESIDE MA
PET, VIJAYAWADA-520002.
IL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, REP
O 5TH FLOORS, NILADRI TOWERS,
BATALLION
ROAD,
ATMAKURU
TUR DISTRICT - 522503.
REP.
BY
CONVENOR,
JAW
VERSITY, GROUND FLOOR, ADMINIS
DA, AP- 533003
RC,J
No.18375 of 2026
ALAPATI
ABOUT 36
MYHOME
KA, AGED
MOTHER
MY HOME
TIONER(S)
. BY ITS
DUCATION
REP. BY
OFFICE
W DELHI -
REP. BY
ND THIRD
ANORAMA
P. BY ITS
SRI RAM
VILLAGE,
WAHARLAL
STRATIVE
RC,J
W.P.No.18375 of 2026
6. DR
K
L
PRASAD
PUBLIC
SCHOOL,
REP.
BY
ITS
CORRESPONDENT/
SECRETARY,
J.K.C.
COLLEGE
ROAD,
GUNTUR-522006.
7. THE PRINCIPAL, DR. K. L. PRASAD PUBLIC SCHOOL, J.K.C.
COLLEGE ROAD, GUNTUR-522006.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order, or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing marks memo by reducing the marks from 23 to 8 in Physics Theory subject in Class XII examination 2026 without being applied for revaluation by the 2nd petitioner and not issuing corrected marks memo by in correcting 23 marks in Physics Theory subject in Class XII examination 2026 is arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to issue a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to issue a correct marks memo by incorporating correct marks of 23 in Physics Theory Subject with a positional grade of D2 forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to issue a revised marks memo by correcting the marks to 23 in Physics Theory subject of Class XII examination 2026 as secured by the 2nd petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.A RAJENDRA BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.T D PHANI KUMAR
2.AKHIL KRISHNAN CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL
RC,J
W.P.No.18375 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition has been filed questioning the action of the respondents in not issuing correct marks memo being arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
2. The evaluated answer sheets along with marks awarded to each question of the subjects Physics and Mathematics have been placed before this Court in sealed covers. They have been opened in the chambers in the presence of the student. They perused the evaluated answer sheets and marks awarded and having satisfied the writ petitioner instructed his counsel to pray for closure of the writ petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel for petitioner prayed this Court to close the writ petition.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 5th August, 2026
RR