Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18375/2026 of YADLAPALLI PRIYANKA Vs Union of India on 4 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 5 PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18375/2026 Between: 1. YADLAPALLI PRIYANKA, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO.304, MYHOME APARTMENTS,

APHC010343722026

IN THE H

(

WEDNESDA

PRESENT:THE HONOU

WRIT

Between:

1. YADLAPALLI PRIYAN

YEARS, OCC H

APARTMENTS, CHA

2. YADLAPALLI DURG

ABOUT 17 YEARS,

SMT. YADLAPALLI

APARTMENTS, CHA

1. UNION OF INDIA,

SECRETARY

TO

DEPARTMENT, SAST

2. CENTRAL BOARD

CONTROLLER

OF

COMPLEX, SECTOR

110077.

3. CENTRAL BOARD

REGIONAL OFFICER

FLOORS, STALIN C

HOTEL, GOVERNOR

4. AP STATE COUNCI

SECRETARY, 2 TO

NAGAR,

6T

B

MANGALAGIRI, GUNT

5. APEAPCET

2026,

TECHNOLOGY UNIV

BUILDING, KAKINAD

W.P.N

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

AY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

URABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMA

T PETITION NO: 18375/2026

NKA, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED A

OUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO.304,

ANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR.

A MANI KARTHIK,, S/O PRIYANK

REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN,

PRIYANKA R/O FLAT NO.304, M

ANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR.

...PETIT

AND

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, REP

GOVERNMENT

OF

INDIA,

ED

TRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-11000

OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,

EXAMINATION,

INTEGRATED

R - 23, PHASE - I, DWARAKA, NEW

OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,

R, REGIONAL OFFICE, SECOND AN

CENTRE, MG ROAD, BESIDE MA

PET, VIJAYAWADA-520002.

IL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, REP

O 5TH FLOORS, NILADRI TOWERS,

BATALLION

ROAD,

ATMAKURU

TUR DISTRICT - 522503.

REP.

BY

CONVENOR,

JAW

VERSITY, GROUND FLOOR, ADMINIS

DA, AP- 533003

RC,J

No.18375 of 2026

ALAPATI

ABOUT 36

MYHOME

KA, AGED

MOTHER

MY HOME

TIONER(S)

. BY ITS

DUCATION

REP. BY

OFFICE

W DELHI -

REP. BY

ND THIRD

ANORAMA

P. BY ITS

SRI RAM

VILLAGE,

WAHARLAL

STRATIVE

RC,J

W.P.No.18375 of 2026

6. DR

K

L

PRASAD

PUBLIC

SCHOOL,

REP.

BY

ITS

CORRESPONDENT/

SECRETARY,

J.K.C.

COLLEGE

ROAD,

GUNTUR-522006.

7. THE PRINCIPAL, DR. K. L. PRASAD PUBLIC SCHOOL, J.K.C.

COLLEGE ROAD, GUNTUR-522006.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order, or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing marks memo by reducing the marks from 23 to 8 in Physics Theory subject in Class XII examination 2026 without being applied for revaluation by the 2nd petitioner and not issuing corrected marks memo by in correcting 23 marks in Physics Theory subject in Class XII examination 2026 is arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to issue a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to issue a correct marks memo by incorporating correct marks of 23 in Physics Theory Subject with a positional grade of D2 forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to issue a revised marks memo by correcting the marks to 23 in Physics Theory subject of Class XII examination 2026 as secured by the 2nd petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.A RAJENDRA BABU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.T D PHANI KUMAR

2.AKHIL KRISHNAN CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL

RC,J

W.P.No.18375 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed questioning the action of the respondents in not issuing correct marks memo being arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

2. The evaluated answer sheets along with marks awarded to each question of the subjects Physics and Mathematics have been placed before this Court in sealed covers. They have been opened in the chambers in the presence of the student. They perused the evaluated answer sheets and marks awarded and having satisfied the writ petitioner instructed his counsel to pray for closure of the writ petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel for petitioner prayed this Court to close the writ petition.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 5th August, 2026

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead