Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/1551/2025 of T K VENKATA RAMANA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 4 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 05.08.2026 Date of uploading : 05.08.2026 APHC010020042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO:

Date of reserved for orders : --

Date of pronouncement : 05.08.2026

Date of uploading : 05.08.2026

APHC010020042025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 1551/2025

Between:

1. T K VENKATA RAMANA, S/O T S.KASI, AGED ABOUT 59

YEARS, OCCUPATION. MINIMUM PAY OF TIMESCALE,

I.A.P. SECTION, SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517501.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO

GOVERNMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HIGHER EDUCATION, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH -

522237.

3. THE REGISTRAR, SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517501.

4. THE

EXECUTIVE

COUNCIL,

SRI

VENKATESWARA

UNIVERSITY, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH -517501

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent not considering my representation dated 07.12.2024 to extend my services from 60 to 62 years and set aside the proceedings dated 28.11.2024

No.

EI(9)/superannuation/2024

which

is

contrary

to

the

G.O.Ms.No.1O date 14.02.2024 and violation of Articles 14,19

and 21 of The Constitution of India, illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation date 07.12.2024 and pass such other orders.

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation date 07.12.2024 and pass such other orders.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. D KISHORE KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

2. RAMESH BABU TALLURI SC For

S.V.UNIVERSITY,TIRUPATI

The Court made the following:

Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No

Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION No.1551 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not continuing the Petitioner in service till he attains the age of 62 years of superannuation on par with the regular employees as provided vide G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV-FR&LR) Department, dated 31.01.2022.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is covered by the Common

Order

dated 21.07.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.12413 of 2025 and batch and requested to pass a similar order in this Writ Petition also.

3. W.P.Nos.12413 of 2025 and batch is disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The State Government shall examine the issue and take a conscious decision about enhancement of age upto 62 years to non-regular employees working for a substantial number of years in State departments and State owned/controlled entities;

(ii) Till such time, the petitioners/non-regular employees in service shall be continued or till they attain the age of 62 years;

(iii) The petitioners who have retired on attaining the age of 60 years may be considered for re-engagement till 62 years in the event no alternative arrangement is made.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II does not dispute the same.

5. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is also disposed of in terms of the Common Order, dated 21.07.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.12413 of 2025 and batch.

6. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Registry is directed to attach the copy of the Common Order, dated 21.07.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.12413 of 2025 and batch to this order.

8. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. _________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 05.08.2026 IS

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION No.1551 of 2025 Date: 05.08.2026

IS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead