Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/15422/2024 of K. Shadab Basha, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15422/2024 Between: 1. K. SHADAB BASHA,, S/O. K. ANWAR BASHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC TEA AND SNACKS BUSINESS,

APHC010309052024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 15422/2024

Between:

1. K. SHADAB BASHA,, S/O. K. ANWAR BASHA, AGED ABOUT

35 YEARS, OCC TEA AND SNACKS BUSINESS, R/O.

H.NO.26-4-76, THAYAGARAJU NAGAR, HINDUPUR, SRI

SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT,

A.P.

SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAUDI, AMARAVATHI.

2. THE

HINDUPUR

MUNICIPALITY,

REP.

BY

ITS

COMMISSIONER, HINDUPUR,SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT

ERSTWHILE ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

3. THE

DISTRICT

PUBLIC

TRANSPORT

OFFICER,

PUTTAPARTHY, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE

ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

4. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, HINDUPUR DEPOT, HINDUPUR,SRI

SATHYA

SAI

DISTRICT

ERSTWHILE

ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tot may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of the 2nd respondent in trying to demolish the temporary structures of the petitioner where petitioner is running Tea and Snacks business in OS.No.25 size 15X17 and running Furniture Business in OS.No.27

and 28 size 30X17 situated at Lepakshi Road, near RTC compound, Hindupur Municipality, Hindupuram, Sri Sathya Sai District without issuing any prior notice and without calling explanation and without providing any opportunity to the petitioner and without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principle of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 21, 300-A of Constitution of India and also violative of AP Municipalities Act, 1965 and consequently respondent not to demolish the structures of the directing the 2nd petitioner in above said property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2"^^ respondent not to demolish the structures of the petitioner where petitioner is running Tea & Snacks business in OS.No.25 size 15X17 and running Furniture Business in OS.No.27 & 28 size 30X17 situated at Lepakshi Road, near RTC compound, Hindupur Municipality, Hindupuram, Sri Sathya Sai District, pending disposal of W.P., and pass s IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to file the counter affidavit in W.P.No.15422 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P NARAHARI BABU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

2. Gudapati Lakshminarayana SC For Municipalities in Rayalaseema Region

3. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)

WRIT PETITION NO: 15422 of 2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for any further consideration.

2. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no adjudication on merits is required.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:05.08.2026 NKA

WRIT PETITION NO: 15422 of 20124 Date: 05.08.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead