Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/21936/2026 of GALLA HARI PRASAD Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 4 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 21936/2026 Between: 1. GALLA HARI PRASAD, S/O. G.LAKSHMI NARASALAH, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O D.N0.4-T942, ANJANTYA
APHC010400882026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 21936/2026
Between:
1. GALLA HARI PRASAD, S/O. G.LAKSHMI NARASALAH, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O D.N0.4-T942, ANJANTYA NAGAR, GOPAVARAM, BADVEL, KADAPA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND COMMAND
AREA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT 522237
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY WATER RESOURCES(R AND
R)
DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-
522237.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR DISTRICT 516001
4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NTR TELUGU GANGA PROJECT
TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 517502
5. THE
SUPERINTENDING
ENGINEER,
SOMASILA
PROJECT CIRCLE DARGAMITTA, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT 524001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not providing employment to the petitioner, inspite of complying the eligibility conditions as per G.O.Ms.No.98 Irrigation Department, dt 15.04,1986 and inspite of petitioner being placed in the list of eligible candidates prepared by the respondents, vide District Selection Committee dt 10.01.2017 and further submitting again documentary evidences in support of their claim as per Public Notice issued by 5 th respondent dt 03.10.202B, as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to provide employment to the petitioner, on the basis of inclusion of petitioner in the list of eligibility candidates list prepared by respondents particularly 5th respondent after submission of objections as per Public Notice dt 03.10.2023, with all consequential benefits, in the interest of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for employment on par with all other similarly placed persons for providing employment on the basis of inclusion of petitioner in the list of eligibility candidates list prepared after Public Notice dt 01.10.2023. by respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V SHIVAJI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.21936 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of the Respondents in not providing employment to the Petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (PROJ. WING) Department, dated 15.04.1986, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The lands of the parents of the Petitioner were acquired at Ravulakollu and Obulampet villages, for the purpose of the Somasila Project in the years 1981 and 1986. As per G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (PROJ. WING) Department, dated 15.04.1986, employment was to be offered to the members of the displaced families or their dependents. The Petitioner, being the dependent of the original landowner, applied for employment in terms of the said G.O. However, though his name was reflected in the shortlisted eligible persons, his case was not considered for employment. Hence, this Writ Petition is filed.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner relies on the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.40372 of 2018 and batch, and
W.P.No.3445 of 2020, wherein employment was directed to be offered to the dependents of the landowners therein, and seeks similar relief in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the land acquisition took place during the years 1981 and 1986 and, despite the lapse of more than 35 years, employment has still not been provided.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that case of the Petitioner will be considered and necessary action will be initiated for providing employment in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98 dated 15.04.1986, as per the rules in force.
5. Considering the fact that the lands of the Petitioner were acquired during the years 1981 and 1986, the delay in providing employment cannot be justified; more so, as the employment was to be treated as part of the promised compensation.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for employment on par with similarly placed persons, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 05.08.2026 chs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO:21936/2026 Dt. 05.08.2026
chs