Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/21322/2026 of P. Surya Prakasa Rao, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [0] FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT WRIT PETITION NO: 21322/2026 Between: P. Surya Prakasa Rao, ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.
APHC010397792026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
WRIT PETITION NO: 21322/2026
Between:
P. Surya Prakasa Rao,
...PETITIONER
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C SUBODH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.21322 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in proposing to relieve the Petitioner on 31.07.2026, on attaining the age of 60 years instead of 62 years, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The Petitioner is working as Plant Attendant in the Respondent No.3 Corporation. The Government, amended the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act, 1984, and enhanced the age of superannuation to 62 years to all the regular employees of the Government.
3. Subsequently, the State Government issued G.O.Ms.No.45 Fin (HR.IV-FR&LR) Department, dated 02.07.2026, enhancing the age of regular employees of entities listed in schedule IX and X of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014. In the light of the above, the Petitioner seeks for enhancement of age of superannuation for 62 years from 60 years.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 would submit that the Respondent Authorities had constituted a Six- Member Committee on 20.07.2026 vide T.O.O (Addl.Secy-Per) Ms No.4321, for examining the feasibility of enhancement of age of superannuation for employees of the Andhra Pradesh Power Utilities.
5. Heard the learned counsels.
6. In the light of the above, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:
i) The Respondents shall continue the Petitioner till the age of 62 years or till a comprehensive decision is taken by the Committee, constituted vide T.O.O (Addl.Secy-Per) Ms No.4321, dated 20.07.2026, for enhancement of the age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years, as the case may be.
ii) There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 31.07.2026 eha
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WP No.21322 of 2026 Date: 31.07.2026
eha
U