Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2128/2026 of Bondiapati Sundara Rao Vs Sri M, Mallikarjuna Naik, I.A.S. on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2128 OF 2026 Between: 1. Bondiapati Sundara Rao, S/o. Peda Thimmaiah Aged 49 Years, Occ Contract Employee, R/o 1-33,

APHC010300222026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2128 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Bondiapati Sundara Rao, S/o. Peda Thimmaiah Aged 49 Years, Occ Contract Employee, R/o 1-33, S. C. Colony, Dornala, Yadavalli, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND

1. Sri M Mallikarjuna Naik, I A S, Principal Secretary to Government, Tribal Welfare Department, Room No. 214 (West), Block-Ill, 1st Floor, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522238.

2. Sri M Gowthami I A S, Secretary, APTWREI Society (Gurukulam), III Floor, Moksha Sai Plaza, NH-16 Service Road, Tadepalli, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh - 522501. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein and punish them with maximum imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Order passed by the Honble A.P. High Court in W.P. No.38964/2022 dated 25.07.2025 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. Srinivasa Rao Narra Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. Vinod Kumar Tarlada The Court made the following Order:

Pursuant to the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.38964 of 2022, dated 25-07-2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had made a representation to the respondents, and the same has been disposed of vide proceedings, dated 09-07-2026.

2. Having regard to the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no orders as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 31-07-2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2128 OF 2026

Dated: 31-07-2026 MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead