Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1543/2015 of S.MOHAMMAD SHAKEER, ANANTAPURAM DT., Vs THE STATE OF AP., REP PP AND ANR., on 30 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1543/2015 Between: 1. S.MOHAMMAD SHAKEER, ANANTAPURAM DT.,, S/O. S.MAHAMMAD SHAFI, WORKING AS A CLERK AT
APHC010673332015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 31st DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1543/2015
Between:
1. S.MOHAMMAD
SHAKEER,
ANANTAPURAM
DT.,,
S/O.
S.MAHAMMAD SHAFI, WORKING AS A CLERK AT MANAPPURAM
PVT.LTD., ANANTAPURM, R/O. D.NO. 28-4-269, VIDYANAGAR
COLONY, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REPT. BY THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF
TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF AP.,AT HYDERABAD.
2. S RUKSANA, W/O. MOHAMMAD SHAKEER, DEPENDENT, R/O.
D.NO.
17/586,
NEERUGANTI
STREET,
ANANTAPURAM,
ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records made in M.C.No.
18 of 2013 dated 1-6-2015 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum- Additional District Judge, Anantapuram set aside the same by allowing the criminal revision.
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2435 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including execution of the order dated 1-6-
2015 made in M.C.No. 18 of 2013 dated 1-6-2015 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge, Anantapuram, pending disposal of the main criminal revision.
IA NO: 2 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 3412 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in Crl.RCMP.No. 2435/2015 dated 31.08.2015
in Crl.RC.No.1543/2015 against the order dated 01.06.2015 made in MC.No.18/2013 on the file of the Family Court cum Addl. District Judge, Ananthapuram Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GANDURI NAGESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. B N SWAMIJI
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1543 OF 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
No representation on either side.
2. On the last adjournment i.e. 02.07.2025, this Court directed the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Ananthapuramu to secure presence of both the parties namely Smt. S. Ruksana W/o. Mohammad Shakeer and Sri S. Mohammad Shakeer, S/o. S. Mohammad Shafi to record their statements and submit brief report. Accordingly, the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Ananthapuramu submitted a report dated 05.08.2025 stating that as per the statements of both the parties, they have settled the matter before the National Lok Adalat on 12.11.2016 and do not know about this case. Learned Secretary also appended Award dated 12.11.2016 in D.V.C.No.25 of 2013, Talaq Settlement Deed dated 10.11.2016 and Certificate of Talaknama (Divorce) dated 11.11.2016. Further, statement of both the parties are also appended to the said letter and as seen from the letter of the learned Secretary coupled with all documents, both the parties settled their issues, respondent No.2 had already given talaq and they have been living separately and she does not know about the pendency of this case. Therefore, this Court came to conclusion that matrimonial disputes between both the parties are already settled before the National Lok Adalat vide Award dated 12.11.2016 and as such, this case has become infructuous.
3. Having recorded the contents of report dated 05.08.2025 coupled with all documents, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J
31.07.2026 Vns