Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9907/2023 of SHAIK NAYAB RASOOL Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 27 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE 28 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9907/2023 Between: 1. SHAIK NAYAB RASOOL, S/O. MOULALI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. HEREDITARY MUTAWALLI, R/O. RTC BUS STAND CENTRE, JALADANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE
APHC010193412023
IN THE
TUESDA
THE HONOURAB
WRIT
Between:
1. SHAIK NAYAB RASO
OCC. HEREDITARY
JALADANKI VILLAGE
A.P.
2. SHAIK ALLA BASHA
YEARS, OCC. HERED
ROAD, JALADANKI
DISTRICT, A.P.
3. SHAIK NAYAB RASO
YEARS, OCC. HERE
CENTRE, JALADANK
DISTRICT, A.P.
1. THE STATE OF AN
SECRETARY, MINOR
BUILDINGS, VELAGA
2. THE A P STATE WA
OFFICER, 4TH AND
OPP.
KALESWARA
DISTRICT, ANDHRA P
3. THE INSPECTOR A
W.P
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA
T PETITION NO: 9907/2023
OOL, S/O. MOULALI, AGED ABOUT 3
MUTAWALLI, R/O. RTC BUS STAND
E AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE D
A, S/O. REHAMAN SAHEB, AGED A
DITARY MUTHAWALLI, R/O. D.NO.1-
VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR
OOL, S/O. RAMTHU SAHEB, AGED A
DITARY MUTHAWALLI, R/O. RTC BU
KI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR
...PETIT
AND
NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P
RITY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECR
APUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADE
AKF BOARD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EX
D 5TH FLOOR, IMDAD GHAR WAKF C
RAO
MARKET,
VIJAYAWADA,
PRADESH.
UDITOR WAKFS, SPSR NELLORE D
RC,J
P.No.907 of 2023
H
ATI
39 YEARS,
CENTRE,
DISTRICT,
ABOUT 46
103, MAIN
NELLORE
ABOUT 45
US STAND
NELLORE
TIONER(S)
PRINCIPAL
RETARIAT
ESH.
XECUTIVE
COMPLEX,
KRISHNA
DISTRICT,
RC,J
W.P.No.907 of 2023
OFFICE AT COLLECTORATE COMPOUND, NELLORE, SPSR
NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P.
4. THE MADINA MASJID EXISTING IN
ASHOORKHANA LAND
MANAGING COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, SYED
RASOOL SAHEB S/O. AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, C/O. MADINA MASJID EXISTING IN ASHOORKHANA LAND, JALADANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toplease to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in F.No.01/NLR/KJ2019, dated 23.02.2023 for constituting the 4th respondent managing committee for the notified wakf institution namely Madina Masjid existing in Ashoorkhana land, Jaladanki Village and Mandal a period of 2
years, U/s.18 of the Wakf Act, 1995 is being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and in violation of provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 and the A.P. Wakf Managing Committee (Constitutions, Functions and Duties)
Regulations, 2009 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to suspend the proceedings issued by the 2 respondent Board for constituting the 4threspondent managing committee vide F.No.01/NLR/KJ2019, dated 23.02.2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.SURYAM GANNAVARAPU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.MOHAMMED GAYASUDDIN
2.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
3.T JANARDHAN RAO
RC,J
W.P.No.907 of 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri G.Suryam, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the writ petition was filed questioning the proceedings of respondent no.2 vide F.No.01/NLR/K/2019, dated 23.02.2023 in constituting the respondent no.4- Managing Committee for notified wakf institution. As the tenure of the Managing Committee of respondent no.4 has already been expired by 22.02.2025, nothing survives for adjudication in the matter and the writ petition has rendered infructuous and to the same effect he also addressed a letter dated 16.07.2026 to the registry.
2. Perused the letter.
3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioner, since nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition the same can be dismissed as infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 28TH July, 2026.
RR