Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/20744/2026 of Chinta Nageswara Rao Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 20744/2026 Between: Chinta Nageswara Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh

APHC010386462026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 20744/2026

Between:

Chinta Nageswara Rao and Others

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. C SUBODH

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following:

W.P.No.20744 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in proposing to relieve the Petitioners on 31.07.2026, on attaining the age of 60 years instead of 62 years, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The Petitioners are working in Executive Cadre in A.P. Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited (for short, ‘APSPDCL’). The Government, amended the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act, 1984, and enhanced the age of superannuation to 62 years to all the regular employees of the Government.

3. Subsequently, the State Government issued G.O.Ms.No.45 Fin (HR.IV-FR&LR) Department, dated 02.07.2026, enhancing the age of regular employees of entities listed in schedule IX and X of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014. In the light of the above, the Petitioners seek for enhancement of age of superannuation for 62 years from 60 years.

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 would submit that the Respondent Authorities had constituted a Six- Member Committee on 20.07.2026 vide T.O.O (Addl.Secy-Per) Ms No.4321, for examining the feasibility of enhancement of age of superannuation for employees of the Andhra Pradesh Power Utilities.

5. Heard the learned counsels.

6. In the light of the above, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:

i) The Respondents shall continue the Petitioners till the age of 62 years or till a comprehensive decision is taken by the Committee, constituted vide T.O.O (Addl.Secy-Per) Ms No.4321, dated 20.07.2026, for enhancement of the age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years, as the case may be.

ii) There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 28.07.2026 eha

WP No.20744 of 2026 Date: 28.07.2026

eha

U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead