Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9397/2024 of VULASALA VENKATA RAMANAIAH @ VULASALA VENKATA RAMANA Vs THE AP GENCO on 27 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 9397 OF 2024 Between: 1. VULASALA VENKATA RAMANAIAH @ VULASALA VENKATA RAMANA, S/o. Pandari Dash, Age- 53 years,
APHC010128652024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 9397 OF 2024
Between:
1. VULASALA VENKATA RAMANAIAH @ VULASALA VENKATA RAMANA, S/o. Pandari Dash, Age- 53 years, Occ-Ex-Construction Contract Labour, R/o.2/129, Kalamalla Village And Post, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh
2. Vemaiagari Venkata Chandraiah, S/o. Venkata Ramana, Age-36 years, Occ- Ex-Construction Contract Labour, R/o.2/32, Kalamalla Village And Post, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.
3. Sana Kantha Rao, S/o. Chinna Pullaiah, Age 35 years, Occ- Ex- Construction Contract Labour, R/o.3/10, Kalamalla Village And Post, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.
4. Misala Mallikarjuna, S/o. Muneiah, Age- 32 years, Occ- Ex-Construction Contract Labour, R/o.3/45, Kalamalla Village And Post, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.
5. Meesala Muni Swamy, S/o. Nadipi Muneiah, Age- 42 years, Occ- Ex- Construction Contract Labour, R/o.7/561, Kalamalla Village And Post, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.
6. Vemaiahgari Venkata Viswanadh, S/o. Venkata Ramana, Age-30 years, Occ- Ex-Construction Contract Labour, R/o.2/32, Kalamalla Village And Post, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.
7. Kunchapu Venkata Subbaiah, S/o. Nadipi Venkata Subbaiah, Age- 35
years, Occ- Ex-Construction Contract Labour, R/o.6/94A, Mekala Balayapalle Village, Yerraguntia Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.
8. Vallepu Guru Sekhar, S/o. Ram Pullaiah, Age- 42 years, Occ-Ex- Construction Contract Labour, R/o.6/18, Settivaripalle Village, Muddanur Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.
...Petitioners
AND
1. THE AP GENCO, Rep. by its Managing Director, Vidyuth Soudha, Gunadala, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh-520004.
2. The Chief General Manager Adm IS and ERP, AP GENCO, Vidyut Soudha, Gunadala, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh-520 004.
3. The Rayalaseema Thermal Power Project, Rep. by its Chief Engineer (O
and M), V.V.Reddy Nagar, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners: PEETA RAMAN
Counsel for the Respondents:
Counsel for the Respondents:K.KRISHNABUSHAN CHOWDARY SC For APGENCO
The Court made the following order:
WRIT PETITION NO: 9397/2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ or order, orders or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus - declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in acting upon 3rd respondents letter communication dt. 12-01-2024 R/w. petitioners representation 09- 10-2023 made to the 3rd respondent, which got acknowledged on 21-10-2023 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative besides violative of Arts. 14, 16 And 21 of the Constitution of India and ii) consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to act upon 3rd respondents letter communication dt. 12-01-2024 R/w. petitioners representation 09-10-2023 made to the 3rd respondent, which got acknowledged on 21-10-2023…”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioners sought an innocuous order for disposal of the writ petition, directing the respondents, to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioners dated 09.10.2023, which was forwarded to the 2nd respondent vide proceedings dated 09.11.2023.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the said representation dated 09.10.2023, forwarded by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings, dated 09.11.2023, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 28.07.2026 Dvs Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
WRIT PETITION NO: 9397/2024 Dt: 28.07.2026 Dvs