Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/20324/2026 of Vuriti Krishna Kumari, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 27 July 2026
& PKC,J WP.NO.20324 OF 2026) APHC010380382026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3601] TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI WRIT PETITION
APHC010380382026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR
CHINTALAPUDI
WRIT PETITION NO: 20324/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VURITI KRISHNA KUMARI,, W/O LATE VURITI APPALANARASAYYA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 11-86, SRI RAMA NAGAR, NEAR GANESH HOTEL, YERRABALEM, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI - 522238.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533003.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JAGGAMPETA POLICE STATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533435.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to. a) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly in the nature of Habeas Corpus, direeting the respondents to immediately produee the petitioners son, Vuriti M.V. Satyanarayana, before this Honble Court b) Declare that the detention of the detenue by the respondents is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India c) Direct the respondents to release the detenue forthwith unless his custody is authorized by a competent Court in accordance with law d) Direct that the detenue be provided immediate and appropriate medical examination and uninterrupted HIV treatment while in custody, if he is found to be in lawful custody e) Pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KUNUKU RAJA SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:
ORDER :- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
Sri T.Ashok Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Kunuku Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the detenu has been traced and he is not in any illegal custody, therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Recording the submission as aforesaid, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI, J Date : 28.07.2026. RPD.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI
(DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS)
WRIT PETITION NO: 20324 of 2026
Date: 28.07.2026
RPD.