Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6166/2026 of LAKSHMISETTY GURU Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 27 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE 28 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6166 OF 2026 Between: 1. LAKSHMISETTY GURU, S/o.Ravi Kumar, aged 21 years, r/o.Dr.No.105 04-421,Flat No.137, Gayathri Nagar, Etukuru, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, India 1. THE UNION OF
APHC010110502026
IN TH
TUESD
THE HONOURA
WRI
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. LAKSHMISETTY GUR 04-421,Flat No.137, Ga District, Andhra Pradesh,
1. THE UNION OF INDIA of India, South Block, New
2. The Bureau of Immigra rep.by its Commissioner R.K.Puram, New Delhi -1
3. The Bureau of Immigr rep.by its Joint Director R.K.Puram, New Delhi- 1
4. The State of Andhra Department, A.P. Secre 522238
5. The Director General 522503 E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL IT PETITION NO: 6166 OF 2026 RU, S/o.Ravi Kumar, aged 21 years, ayathri Nagar, Etukuru, Guntur-52 , India AND A, rep. by Department of Home Affair w Delhi -110001 ation, Ministry of Home Affairs, Gove r, (Immigration), East Block-VIII Lev 10001 ration, Ministry of Home Affairs Gove , (Immigration), East Block-VIII Lev 10001 a Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Sec etariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, of Police, Atmakuru, Mangalagiri, G DESH
LAPATI r/o.Dr.No.105- 22017, Guntur ...Petitioner rs, Government ernment of India, vel-V Sector-1, ernment of India, vel-V Sector-1, cretary, Home Guntur District- Guntur District -
6. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu District- 522601
7. The Station House Officer, Atchampet Police Station, Palanadu District- 522409
8. Ambati Narasimha Rao, Son of Narayana, Aged 42 years, Occ Business, Resident of Peddapalem Village, Achampet Mandal, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh 522410. R8 impleaded in Writ Petition and Affidavit as per Courts Order Dt. 20.04.2026 in I.A.No. 02 of 2026. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing and continuing the LOOK OUT CIRCULAR against the petitioner in connection with Cr.No.111/2024 u/s.420, 506 r/w.34 of IPC of Atchampet Police Station, Palnadu District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to recall withdraw the LOOK OUT CIRCULAR and permit the petitioner to travel abroad for pursuing his studies and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly respondents 2&3 not to take any coercive steps pursuant to the Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner in connection with Cr.No.111/2024 u/s.420, 506 r/w.34 of IPC of Atchampet Police Station, Palnadu District and permit the petitioner to travel abroad for pursuing his studies, without insisting upon detention, subject to such conditions as this Hon’ble Court deems fit, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner (Implead Petitioner) herein as proposed Respondents No. 8 in W.P. No. 6166 of 2026, Along with all the Interlocutory Applications in the interest of justice and for effective and proper adjudication of the issued involved in the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: HABIBULLA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondents: PATHI SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: NAMRATHA CHOUDARY P CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following order:
Sri P.A.K.Yadav, learned counsel, representing Sri Habibulla Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infrucutous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 28.07.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO:6166 of 2026 Date: 28.07.2026
MP