Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2214/2025 of SOKE RADHA Vs SRI S SURESH KUMAR IAS on 26 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010425142025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2214/2025 Between: 1. SOKE
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010425142025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2214/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SOKE RADHA, W/O. S. VENKATA RAMANA, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.4-7-215-2, SBI COLONY, PULIVENDULA TOWN AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 238.
2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 238.
3. DR SREEDHAR CHERUKURI IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. SRI D RAMUDU, COMMISSIONER PULIVENDULA MUNICIPALITY,
PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA
DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS.
5. J RAMANA MURTY, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
6. G KIRAN KUMAR, MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, PULIVENDULA MUNICIPALITY, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, for willful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 11.03.2025 passed in W.P.No.3298 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T VENU GOPAL Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA
2. The Court made the following:
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.C.No.2214 of 2026 O R DE R:
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that pursuant to the order of this Court, the amount due to the Petitioner was paid and nothing survives for adjudication in the contempt case.
2. Noting the said submission, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 27.07.2026
KLP