Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/753/2012 of PVENATA NAIDU Vs SMT. BANDARU MANJULA on 26 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 753 OF 2012 Between: 1. PVENATA NAIDU, S./o P. Narayana Swamy, Occ;Agriculture, R/o Bondalawada
APHC010454762012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. PVENATA NAIDU, S./o P. Narayana Swamy, Occ;Agriculture, R/o Bondalawada Village, Narpala Mandal, Anantapur District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. SMT BANDARU MANJULA, W/o P.Venkata Naidu, D/o B.Krishna Murthy Chowdary, R/o D.No. 20/2127 , H.B.Cpolony, Guntakal Town, Anantapur District.
...Respondent
Appeal Under Section_____against orders
Counsel for the Petitioner: ELEVATED AS JUDGE
Counsel for the Respondent
The Court made the following order:
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)
The present appeal is filed aggrieved by the order dated 11.04.2012
passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur, in O.P.No.27
of 2009, whereby the petition filed by the appellant-husband under Section 12(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was dismissed.
2.
The Court below, upon consideration of the material on record, dismissed the petition holding that the appellant had failed to establish any of the grounds warranting a declaration under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
3.
It is brought to the notice of this Court that the learned counsel for the appellant has been elevated as a Judge of this Court vide order dated 29.06.2026. Consequently, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant. In compliance with the said direction, notice was issued to the appellant; however, the same was returned with the endorsement, "Addressee left without instructions."
4.
In view of the said endorsement, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant is no longer interested in prosecuting the appeal.
5.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed.
____________
D.RAMESH, J
____________________
ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J
Dated:27.07.2026
TJN
63
Dated: 27.07.2026
TJN
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 753 OF 2012
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL.
NO.
DATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
27.7.2026
DR, J & AGD, J
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vide Separate Judgment)
_______
DR, J
_______
AGD, J TJN