Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/753/2012 of PVENATA NAIDU Vs SMT. BANDARU MANJULA on 26 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 753 OF 2012 Between: 1. PVENATA NAIDU, S./o P. Narayana Swamy, Occ;Agriculture, R/o Bondalawada

APHC010454762012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. PVENATA NAIDU, S./o P. Narayana Swamy, Occ;Agriculture, R/o Bondalawada Village, Narpala Mandal, Anantapur District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. SMT BANDARU MANJULA, W/o P.Venkata Naidu, D/o B.Krishna Murthy Chowdary, R/o D.No. 20/2127 , H.B.Cpolony, Guntakal Town, Anantapur District.

...Respondent

Appeal Under Section_____against orders

Counsel for the Petitioner: ELEVATED AS JUDGE

Counsel for the Respondent

The Court made the following order:

JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)

The present appeal is filed aggrieved by the order dated 11.04.2012

passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur, in O.P.No.27

of 2009, whereby the petition filed by the appellant-husband under Section 12(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was dismissed.

2.

The Court below, upon consideration of the material on record, dismissed the petition holding that the appellant had failed to establish any of the grounds warranting a declaration under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

3.

It is brought to the notice of this Court that the learned counsel for the appellant has been elevated as a Judge of this Court vide order dated 29.06.2026. Consequently, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant. In compliance with the said direction, notice was issued to the appellant; however, the same was returned with the endorsement, "Addressee left without instructions."

4.

In view of the said endorsement, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant is no longer interested in prosecuting the appeal.

5.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Appeal shall stand closed.

____________

D.RAMESH, J

____________________

ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J

Dated:27.07.2026

TJN

63

Dated: 27.07.2026

TJN

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 753 OF 2012

PROCEEDING SHEET

SL.

NO.

DATE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE

27.7.2026

DR, J & AGD, J

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vide Separate Judgment)

_______

DR, J

_______

AGD, J TJN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead