Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2397/2025 of M/s. Radhananda Chilli Traders, Vs Smt. M. Vijaya Sunitha, I.A.S., on 23 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 24 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2397/2025 Between: 1. M/S. RADHANANDA CHILLI J. NANDA KISHORE, S/O. SRI J. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O. KRISHNA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR
APHC010380432025
IN THE H
(
FRIDAY
THE HONOURA
CONT
Between:
1. M/S. RADHANANDA
J. NANDA KISHORE
YEARS, R/O. KRISHN
1. SMT M VIJAYA SUN
OF AGRICULTURAL
GUNTUR.
2. SRI
A
BHARGAV
COLLECTOR, AGRIC
3. SMT A CHANDRIK
DEPUTATION), AGR
Counsel for the Petitioner
1.K MADHAVA REDDY
Counsel for the Contemno
1.Gangisetty Rajeswara
Committees
2.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY
TEMPT CASE NO: 2397/2025
CHILLI TRADERS,, REP. BY ITS PRO
, S/O. SRI J. SRINIVASA RAO, AGE
NA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTR
...PE
AND
NITHA I A S, COMMISSIONER AND D
MARKETING, MIRCH MARKET YAR
TEJ
I
A
S,
PERSON-LN-CHAR
CULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, GU
KA, SELECTION GRADE SECRETA
RICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, G
...CONTE
r:
or(S):
rao,Standing Counsel For Agricultural M
Y
OPRIETOR
ED ABOUT
RICT
TITIONER
DIRECTOR
RD (OLD),
RGE/JOINT
UNTUR.
ARY (ON
UNTUR.
MNOR(S):
Marketing
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY
Contempt Case No.2397 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Contempt Case is filed seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 20.09.2022 in W.P.No.7717 of 2021.
2. Today, when the contempt case is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents jointly states that the order passed by this Court in W.P. No. 7717 of 2021, dated 20.09.2022, has been complied with and the petitioner has obtained the Commission Agent License. Learned counsel for the respondents also produced a copy of the said license before this Court.
3. In view of the same, as order passed by this Court has been complied with, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Contempt Case shall stand closed. __________________
K SURESH REDDY, J Date: 24.07.2026 Asr