Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11866/2025 of Vemula Vijay Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 23 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 11866 OF 2025 Between: 1. VEMULA VIJAY KUMAR,, S/O. VEMULA SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY
APHC010172942025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11866 OF 2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VEMULA VIJAY KUMAR,, S/O. VEMULA SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER VEMULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VEMULA VEDADARI, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. 12-131, AKULAVARI STREET, JAGGAYYAPETA, JAGGAYYAPETA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. GADDIGOPULA INDIRA,, D/O. GADDIGOPULA PANDU RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER GADDIGOPULA PANDU RANGA RAO, S/O GADDIGOPULA BALA KRISHNA, R/O.10-36, KANAKADURGA BAZAR, JAGGAYYAPETA, JAGGAYYAPETA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. ANALA VENKATA AJAY SURENDRA MANIKANTA,, S/O. ANALA SURYA PRABHAKARA RAO, AGE 24 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER ANALA SURYA PRABHAKARA RAO, S/O. ACHIYYA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. 10-4/22, OPP. OLD SUBBAIAH HOTEL STUDENT, SESHAGIRI RAO STREET, SHANKARA MATAM, NEAR SHIVA ARCADE APARTMENT, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THUNGA SAI KIRAN,, S/O. THUNGA VENKATESH BABU, AGE 24 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER THUNGA VENKATESH BABU, S/O. PATTABHIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. CHOWDEPALLE VILLAGE, CHOWDEPALLE MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. SEGABANDI KOMAL VENKAT KUMAR,, S/O. SEGABANDI SIVA KUMAR, AGE 26 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER SEGABANDI SIVA KUMAR, S/O. NASARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57
YEARS, R/O. 60-3-4, NEAR MARIS STELLA COLLEGE, RAMACHANDRA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), KRISHNA DISTRICT -520008 CAUSE TITLE IS AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.22.06.2026 IN I.A.NO.1 OF 2026
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, B.C. WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE KAPU, WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR D. NO. 12-467, 3RD FLOOR, POTHURI MERCANTILE NH-16 SERVICE ROAD, TADEPALLI - 522 501
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
4. THE DIRECTOR, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, IBRAHIMPATNAM, NTR DISTRICT.
5. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
6. THE DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT VIJAYAWADA.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
2. Chejarla Venkateswara rao SC For A.P.Kapu welfare and developement Corp.LTD
3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for the respondent No.1 and Sri Chejarla Venkateswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent No.2.
2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in not paying the scholarship amount under the A.P. State Kapu Welfare and Development Corporation Videsi Vidya Deevena Scheme, to the petitioners', despite their selection under the Videsi Vidya Deevena Scheme, Phase-I (2019-20) and completion of their respective courses.
3. The 2nd respondent filed counter-affidavit stating that the petitioners are eligible for financial assistance under the Videshi Vidya Deevena Scheme. Since the budget for clearance of the pending dues is yet to be sanctioned, the amount would be credited to the petitioners as soon as the budget is released by the Government.
4. Having regard to the same, as the sum of financial assistance is admitted as payable to the petitioners’, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to remit the admitted amount to the petitioners’, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.
5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 24.07.2026 BSK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11866 OF 2025
Dated: 24.07.2026 BSK