Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/20450/2026 of B NAGESH Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 20450/2026 Between: 1. B NAGESH, S/O B. BASANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCCRETD. EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.1-16, ANJANEYA

APHC010379972026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 20450/2026

Between:

1. B NAGESH, S/O B. BASANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCCRETD. EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.1-16, ANJANEYA TEMPLE, BELUGUPPA, N. GUNDLAPALLI, NARINJAGUNDLAPALLE, ANANTAPURU - 515 741, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, 522237

2. THE CHIEF MANAGER AND BOARD SECRETARY OFFICE OF

THE COMMISSIONER, PTD AND EX-OFFICIO VC AND MD, APSRTC, RTC HOUSE, PNBS, VIJAYAWADA. A.P-520013

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU. A.P-515001

4. THE

DEPOT

MANAGER,

APSRTC,

RAYADURG,

ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. A.P-515311

5. THE DEPUTY CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER, APSRTC, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. A.P-515001

6. THE

REGIONAL

MANAGER,

APSRTC,

ANANTAPURAMU

DISTRICT. A.P-515001

7. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA

PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, RTC

HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH -,

520013.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus against the proceedings oft the 2nd respondent vide No.P2/754(16)/2025-PO-lll dt. 18-06-2025 in rejecting the representation of the petitioner for compassionate appointment who retired Medical Invalidation Scheme to the son B. Mahaesh on the representations of the petitioner dt.03-07- 2023 and 23-04-2025 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of APSRTC

Employees (Service) Regulations, 1964 and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the son of the petitioner on compassionate grounds basing on the retirement of the petitioner under Medical Invalid Scheme by considering the representations of the petitioner dt.03-07-2023 and 23-04-2025 in the interest of justice and equity and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to 6)/2025-suspend the proceedings of the 2nd respondent Vide No P2/754 (16)/2025 PO-III dt. 18-06-2025, pending disposal of the mafn^Writ petitidli and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to appoint the son of the petitioner on compassionate grounds basing on the retirement of!the petitioner under Medical Invalid Scheme by considering the representations of the petitioner dt.03-07-2023 and 23-04-2025 in the interest of Justice and equity, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G VENKATESULU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.20450 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, due to over- sight, the present Writ Petition was filed in the name of the father for compassionate appointment, whereas, the Writ Petition has to be filed by the son of the Petitioner for compassionate appointment and seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a request to grant liberty to file fresh Writ Petition in the name of son of the Petitioner.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh Writ Petition in the name of son of the Petitioner.

4. No order as to costs.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Date: 24.07.2026 chs Speaking ✔ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ✔

WRIT PETITION No.20450 of 2026 Dated: 24.07.2026

chs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead