Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/693/2006 of VAJRAPU JAGANNADHAM R/O RAJAHMUNDRY Vs SRI MARAPATLA VENKATESULU & ANOTHER on 23 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 693/2006 Between: VAJRAPU JAGANNADHAM R/O RAJAHMUNDRY, S/O VENKATA RAMANA
APHC010374712006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 693/2006
Between:
VAJRAPU JAGANNADHAM R/O RAJAHMUNDRY, S/O VENKATA
RAMANA R/O DR. NO.32-1-92, PINNAGATTUVARI STREET, K.V.R.
SWAMY ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G. DIST.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SRI MARAPATLA VENKATESULU ANOTHER, S/O VEERAYYA
DRIVER OF APSRTC R/O KOVVURU DEPOT, KOVVUR (M), W.G.DISTRICT
2. ANDHRA
PRADESH
STATE
ROAD
TRANSPORT,
CORPORATION
REP.
BY
ITS
GENERAL
MANAGER
MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court Counsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
K SRINIVASA PRASAD SC For APSRTC
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
1. None appeared for the appellant. Appellant is called absent.
2. Report received from the Principal District Court, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram stating that the notice sent to the appellant was returned unserved, since no such person residing in the said address.
3. Having regarding to the above, it is evident from the record that the appellant did not evince any interest to prosecute the matter, thereby, the same is liable for dismissal.
4. Therefore, the M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed for non prosecution. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 24.07.2026 Krs
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
M.A.C.M.A.No.693 of 2006
( ORDER )
DATE: 24.07.2026
Krs