Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1247/2026 of KURUVA GADILINGAPPA Vs HARIJANA KALAMMA on 23 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 24 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1247/2026 Between: 1. KURUVA GADILINGAPPA, S/O. KURUVA SIDDAPPA, AGED AOBUT 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, HOLAGUNDA VILLAGE, ALUR TALUK, KURNOOL
APHC010211592026
IN THE H
(
FRIDAY
THE HONOURA
CIVIL REV
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KURUVA GADILINGA 55 YEARS, OCC AG TALUK, KURNOOL D
2. KUNTANAHAL RAME ABOUT 45 YEARS, O ALUR TALUK, KURNO
1. HARIJANA KALAMMA 55 YEARS, OCC AG TALUK, KURNOOL D
2. HARIJANA YELLAPP YEARS, OCC AGRI TALUK, KURNOOL D
3. HARIJANA ERANNA, 65 YEARS, OCC AG TALUK, KURNOOL D Petition under Article 2 circumstances stated in th pleased to pleased to DIR I.A.No. 241 of 2025 in O.S justice and pass HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY VISION PETITION NO: 1247/2026 APPA, S/O. KURUVA SIDDAPPA, AGE GRICULTURIST, HOLAGUNDA VILLAG ISTRICT. ESH,, S/O. KUNTANAHAL SHEKANNA OCC AGRICULTURIST, HOLAGUNDA OOL DISTRICT. ...PETIT AND A, W/O. HARIJANA ANANDAPPA, AGE GRICULTURIST, HOLAGUNDA VILLAG ISTRICT. A, S/O. HARIJANA DEVAPPA, AGED CULTURIST, HOLAGUNDA VILLAG ISTRICT. S/O. HARIJANA LAKSHMAMMA, AGE GRICULTURIST, HOLAGUNDA VILLAG ISTRICT. ...RESPON 227 of the Constitution of India, praying he grounds filed herein, the High Cou RECT the Junior Civil Judge, Alur to S.No. 141 of 2025 expeditiously to me
[3239] Y ED AOBUT GE, ALUR A, AGED VILLAGE, TIONER(S) EDA BOUT GE, ALUR BOUT 32 GE, ALUR ED ABOUT GE, ALUR NDENT(S): g that in the urt may be dispose off eet ends of
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following ORDER:
Seeking an innocuous relief for a direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Alur, to dispose of I.A.No.241/2025 in O.S.No.141/2025, the defendants filed the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. Heard Sri Butta Vijaya Bhasker, learned counsel for the petitioners.
3. The respondents herein filed O.S.No.141/2025 for permanent injunction. Along with the suit they also filed I.A.No.241/2025 seeking ad- interim injunction. By order dt. 14.07.2025, the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Alur granted ex-parte interim injunction. Thereafter, the petitioners / defendants filed counter on 27.07.2025. From that date onwards I.A.No.241/2025 is being adjourned from time-to-time. The grievance of the petitioners is that the said I.A. was not disposed of from 27.07.2025 onwards. The petitioners’ request is only to direct the trial Court to dispose of I.A.No.241/2025 as expeditiously as possible.
4. As no adverse orders are passed, there is no necessity to hear the respondents.
5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Alur, Kurnool District, is directed to dispose of I.A.No.241/2025 in O.S.No.141/2025 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing both sides and after giving an opportunity to both sides.
With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ K.SURESH REDDY, J 24.07.2026 MVA