Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3318/2026 of DHULIPALA LAKSHMI MADHRI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 22 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3318/2026 Between: 1. DHULIPALA LAKSHMI MADHRI, W/O HARI KIRAN VISWAMITHRA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO.
APHC010056722026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 3318/2026
Between:
1. DHULIPALA LAKSHMI MADHRI, W/O HARI KIRAN VISWAMITHRA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 43-106/1-52 C-3, NANDAMURI NAGAR, AS NAGAR, ROAD NO-7, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
2. PINGALI SRINIVASA SEKHAR, S/O CHANDRA SEKHAR AGED 43
R/O DOOR NO.43-106/1-52 C-4, NANDAMURI NAGAR, AS
NAGAR,ROAD NO-7, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
3. ABDUL JALEEL, S/O ABDUL KALEL AGED 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO.43- 106/1-52 C-6, NANDAMURI NAGAR, AS NAGAR, ROAD NO-7, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
4. PERURI PREM KUMAR, S/O CHINA AGED 46 YEARS/O DOOR
NO.43-106/1-52C-2, NANDAMURI NAGAR, AS NAGAR, ROAD NO-7, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
5. YADDLLA LAKSHMI, W/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED 45 YEARS, D.NO 43-106/1-52 C-7, NANDAMURI NAGAR, AS NAGAR, ROAD
NO-7, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS
AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522238.
2. VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS THE
COMMISSIONER,
VIJAYAWADA,
NTR
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA
PRADESH-520001.
3. THE
CITY
PLANNING
OFFICER,
VIJAYAWADA
MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION,
VIJAYAWADA,
NTR
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA
PRADESH-520001
4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
IRRIGATION
DEPARTMENT.
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA
PRADESH-522238.
5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NTR DISTRICT,VIJAYAWADA, NTR
DISTRICT-520001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.
3 and the employees of the 3 respondent issued a demolishing the house of the petitioner under the guise of the 4th respondent on 22.01.2026 at 04.00
am
in
House
No.
106-182
Nandamuri
Nagar,
As
Nagar,Vijayawada,krishna District without there being any notice or case or cause as illegal, arbitrary and also oppose to Article 300-A of the Constitution of India consequentially direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the property of the petitioner in House 43- 106-182 C- 2,3,4,6,7, Nandamuri Nagar,As Nagar,Vijayawada,krishna forthwith by directing the respondents authority to release the Budameru band rules and regulations zones of said river, and to pass
Pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the property of the petitioners in House 43-106-182 C- 2,3,4,6,7, andamuri Nagar,Ajith Singh Nagar,Vijayawada-520015 NTR District forthwith by directing the 2nd respondent authority for issue of Budameru Zones pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass
May be pleased to permit the petition to amend the relief portion in n W.P.No.
3318 of 2026 by substituting the prayer portion to the following effect: "For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 In issuing the Impugned notice dated 22.01.2026 to demolish residential house of the petitioners i.e House No.43-106-182 C- 2,3,4,6.,7, Nandamuri Nagar, As Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District,as illegal, arbitrary Article -14,19/1G and also 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequentially direct the respondents2 and 3 herein not to interferewith the peaceful possession of the property of the petitioner in House No.43-106- 182 C-2,3,4,6,7, Nandamuri Nagar, As Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District forthwith and to pass
May be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner herein/Respondent No.2 in the Writ Petition No.3318 of 2026 to file affidavit in the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P.Y.KIRAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD
2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
3. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC
WRIT PETITION NO: 3318 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Though the matter was adjourned on 08.04.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 19.06.2026. Even on that day there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was listed today.
Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the case.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:23.07.2026 RSD
WRIT PETITION NO: 3318 of 2026 Date: 23.07.2026
RSD