Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/14766/2025 of N KARUNAKAR REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 22 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14766/2025 Between: 1. N KARUNAKAR REDDY, S/O. N GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 87/929-2-GF-1

APHC010263812025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 14766/2025

Between:

1. N KARUNAKAR REDDY, S/O. N GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT

YEARS,

R/O.

H.NO.

87/929-2-GF-1

SAI

SHLOKA

RESIDENCY,TELECOM

NAGAR,

KURNOO,

KURNOOL

DISTRICT-518002.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE

SECRETARY

ROADS

AND

BUILDINGS

(R

AND

B)

DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY

FINANCE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR

DISTRICT.

3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER R AND B DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R., DISTRICT.

4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, , (R AND B) R AND B

CIRCLE, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER R AND B, (R AND B) DIVISION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the responds in not releasing total payment of Rs.40,85,086/- vide Agreement No. 20/2023-24, date 16.09.2023 even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., (1) Urgent repairs to Damaged Sunshades, Painting to the External Walls of South Block and Providing of Front Arch at Collectorate Complex at Kurnool in Kurnool district, vide M.Book.No.1785A as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to release Rs. 40,85,086/- for the pending final bills forthwith for the above said works executed by the petitioner and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of amount of Rs. 40,85,086/- vide Agreement No. 20/2023-24, date: 16.09.2023, vide M.Book.No.1785A even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works forthwith, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Leave for filing of the Counter Affidavit in WP.No.14766 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KOMMA VIJAYA RAJ KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the non-payment of bill amounts to the petitioner for the work pertaining to Agreement No.20/2023-24 dated 16.09.2023, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Heard Sri Komma Vijaya Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shaik Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings for the respondents.

3. Sri Shaik Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings on counter submitted that, the authorities have admitted to pay the entitled net amount to the petitioner and sought four months time for such payment.

4. To the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioner reported no objection, however, prayed to grant reasonable time.

5. Taking the submissions of both the learned counsel into consideration and as the authorities are ready to pay the admitted amount to the petitioner, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition, at the admission stage by passing the following order:

“The respondents are directed to release the legally admitted/entitled net amount to the petitioner at the earliest, and at any rate, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.”

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 23rd July, 2026

RKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead