Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/19498/2026 of Koti Rambabu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 19498/2026 Between: Koti Rambabu, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

APHC010349262026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 19498/2026

Between:

Koti Rambabu,

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.19498 of 2026 O R DE R:

The Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in omitting the Petitioner from the Seniority List of the Senior Assistant for consideration of his case for the post of Superintendent as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The Petitioner was initially appointed as Junior Assistant on 07.10.1994 and thereafter, he was promoted as Senior Assistant on 15.07.2005 and posted in the office of the Superintending Engineer, NSJC, O & M, Lingamguntla, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District. The Petitioner is aspiring for further promotion to the post of Superintendent. While so, the Petitioner was informed that his name is removed from the seniority list of Senior Assistant. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that promotions to the post of Superintendent will be conducted in accordance with the rules, taking into account the length of service of the individuals in the cadre of Senior Assistant.

4. Heard the learned counsels.

5. Considering the submissions made, the grievance of the Petitioner is redressed.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 23.07.2026 eha

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO:19498/2026 Dt. 23.07.2026

eha

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead