Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/2451/2007 of SARASWATHI DAS & ANR Vs S.SURYANARAYANA & 2 ORS on 21 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2451/2007 Between: 1. SARASWATHI DAS & ANR, W/O.JABAND DAS, HINDU
APHC010273342007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. SARASWATHI DAS & ANR, W/O.JABAND DAS, HINDU HOUSEWIFE
R/O.BALAJI NAGAR, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA.
2. JAGABAND DAS, S/O.HEERALAL DAS, HINDU R/O.BALAJI NAGAR, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. S SURYANARAYANA 2 ORS, S/O.VENKATA RAO, HINDU DRIVER
OF TRACTOR R/O.ADAMILLI, K.KOTAK MANDAL, A.P.
2. AVULA
BASAVA
PURNAIAH,
S/O.SURYANARAYANA,
HINDU
R/O.NAGESWARA
RAO
METTA,
RAMAGUNDAM,
DWARAKA
TIRUMALA MANDAL.
3. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD, REP BY ITS BRANCH
MANAGER O/O.1ST FLOOR, PRAKASH MANSION, POWERPEET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Courtset aside the finding in the judgement and decree passed in MVOP No.774 of 2004 dated 20.07.2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Court cum VIII
Addl.District and Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court] Vijayawada dismissing the said MVOP No.774 of 2004 against the respondent and allow in OP
No.774 of 2004
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. RAVI KUMAR TOLETY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A JAYANTHI
2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE
3. NARAM NAGESWARA RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:-
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal” today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The proceeding sheet dated 21.07.2026, would also show that there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
2. Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned counsel for the respondent/Insurance company is in attendance.
3. In that view of the matter, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.07.2026. UPS
Dt.22.07.2026
UPS