Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/18429/2012 of Smt. Somana Veera Venkata Subrahmanyeswari, Vs The Union of India, on 21 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18429/2012 Between: 1. SMT. SOMANA VEERA VENKATA SUBRAHMANYESWARI,, W/O LATE NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS,
APHC010229172012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 18429/2012
Between:
1. SMT. SOMANA VEERA VENKATA SUBRAHMANYESWARI,, W/O
LATE NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.16/168A-1, MACHAVARAM, CHILAKALAPUDI POST, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF
ARCHEOLOGY, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI.
2. THE
DIRECTOR,
ARCHEOLOGY,
SURVEY
OF
INDIA,
GUNFOUNDRY, HYDERABAD.
3. THE SENIOR CONSERVATION ASSISTANT, ARCHEOLOGY
SURVEY OF INDIA, ARJUN STREET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings in pursuant to file No.DE/ ECM/2011/2931, dated.06-04- 2011 and proceedings in F.No.9/1-18/2011-M-4883, dated 08-03-2012
issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the principle of natural justice and law and consequently to set aside and quash all the proceedings in pursuant to file No.DE/ECM/2011/2931, dated.06-04-2011 and proceedings in F.No.9/1-18/2011-M-4883, dated 08-032012 issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondent and to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated in D.No. 16/ 168A
admeasuring 241.88 Sq.yards in Machavaram, Krishna District in any manner IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WVMP 2961 OF 2012
be pleased vacate the interim order dated: 21-06-2012 passed in WPMP
No. 23590 of 2012 in WP No. 18429 of 2012
IA NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP 23590 OF 2012
be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to file No.DE/ECM/ 2011/2931, dated.06-04-2011 and proceedings in F.No.9/1- 18/2011-M-4883, dated 08-03-2012 issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondent including dispossession and pending disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 5 OF 2012(WPMP 101988 OF 2012
be pleased
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. BACHINA HANUMANTHA RAO (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
2. B HANUMANTHA RAO(SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with him for a long time and he has no instructions in the matter.
When the writ petitions are pending before the Court, the parties should invariably be in contact with their advocate, however, in the present case, the petitioner are not pursuing the case through her advocate, it shows that the petitioner has no interest in pursuing the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, she can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 22nd July, 2026
RKS