Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/34209/2016 of A. RAMA MOHANA RAO, KRISHNA DIST. Vs PRL. SECY., M.A. & U.D. DEPT. & 2 ORS. on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010485432016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO:

HN, J

W.P.No.34209_2016

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010485432016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 34209/2016

Between:

1. A. RAMA MOHANA RAO, KRISHNA DIST., S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, OCC :

BUSINESS, AGED ABOUT 64 YRS, R/O D.NO.5-143, NIDAMANURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH

...PETITIONER

AND

1. PRL SECY M A U D DEPT 2 ORS, SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.

2. THE

CAPITAL

REGION

DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY,

REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA

DISTRICT.

3. THE GRAMPANCHAYAT NIDAMANURU VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA

RURAL MANDAL,KRISHNA DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS

SECRETARY.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and their officials in trying to demolish the Petitioners building

HN, J

W.P.No.34209_2016

admeasuring in an extent of 302 Sy. Yds bearing door No.5-143, Nidamanuru Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District as being illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent Nos. 2

and 3 not to demolish the petitioners building and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case forthwith.

IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 42198 OF 2016

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 not to demolish the Petitioner building admeasuring in an extent of 302 Sy. Yds bearing door No.5-143, Nidamanuru Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 2056 OF 2017

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders in WPMP.No.42198/2016 WP.No. 34209/2016, dated 30.09.2016 and dismiss the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. N PAVAN KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. A S C BOSE

2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)

3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT)

4. ELEVATED AS JUDGE

HN, J

W.P.No.34209_2016

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present writ petition is filed, being aggrieved by the action of the respondents in trying to demolish the petitioner’s property without following the due process of law.

2. This Court, vide order dated 30.09.2016, granted an interim direction as prayed for. Thereafter, the matter has been listed for hearing today.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed off, leaving it open for the respondents to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. If any action has already been initiated prior to the passing of this order, the same shall be governed by law. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:22.07.2026 NKA

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HN, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 34209 of 2016 Date: 22.07.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead