Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5997/2008 of Satti Padmavathi, Vs Grama Secretariat, Kommara, on 21 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 22 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No: 5997 of 2008 Between: 1. SATTI PADMAVATHI, W/o. SATTI VENKATA MOHANA HANUMAN REDDY, KOMMARA VILLAGE, ATHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
APHC010381862008
IN THE H
(
WEDNESD
THE HONOURAB
WRIT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SATTI PADMAVATHI REDDY, KOMMARA DISTRICT.
1. GRAMA SECRETAR ATHILI MANDAL, WE
2. THE REVENUE DIVIS KOVVUR, WEST GOD
3. THE TAHSILDAR, AT
Counsel for the Petitioner
1. Mr.S.APPADHARA RE Counsel for the Responde
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. Mr.A S C BOSE
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURY T PETITION No: 5997 of 2008 I, W/o. SATTI VENKATA MOHANA H VILLAGE, ATHILI MANDAL, WEST G ...PE AND RIAT, KOMMARA, REP. BY ITS SEC ST GODAVARI DISTRICT. SIONAL OFFICER, LAND ACQUISITIN DAVARI DISTRICT. HILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DIST ...RESPON r: EDDY ent(S):
YA HANUMAN GODAVARI TITIONER CRETARY, OFFICER, TRICT. NDENT(S):
The Court made the following order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite his efforts, he could not secure instructions in the matter.
On the other hand, Ms.Vijayeswari, learned Assistant Government Pleader placed a copy of latest instructions dated 22.07.2026 received from the 3rd respondent for perusal of the Court.
As seen from the said instructions and the letter enclosed to it, it appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition and the letter in this regard was addressed to 1st respondent on 11.10.2022. Obviously that might be the reason for the petitioner not responding to the learned counsel for the petitioner. Be that as it may. Placing instructions and the letter annexed to it on record, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Date: 22.07.2026 BLV
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
W.P.No.5997 of 2008 Dt: 22.07.2026
BLV