Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/51/2015 of SALADI KANAKA DURGA, W.G. DIST. Vs STATE OF A.P., REP. BY P.P. HYD & ANR on 21 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement :23.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010540862015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :23.07.2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010540862015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 51/2015
Between:
1. SALADI KANAKA DURGA, W.G. DIST., W/O. VENKATATYA
NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 25-4-14, SAMBUNIPETA, NEAR AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE
CHECKPOST, DODDIPATLA ROAD, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE OF A P REP BY P P HYD ANR, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD
2. GUDIMETLA SAI MURALI REDDY, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 39 YEARS, BUSINESS, RIO. JUTTIGA, IRAGAVARAM
MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P DURGA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. I MAAMU VANI
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.51 of 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri A. Bhargav, learned counsel representing Sri P. Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, submitted that the present Criminal Revision Case against the order passed under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, "Cr.P.C.") and Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is not maintainable. Therefore, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Revision Case with a liberty to take appropriate legal steps.
2. Recording the said submission, permission is accorded. Accordingly, the revision petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present Criminal Revision Case with a liberty to take appropriate legal steps, in accordance with law.
3. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. The interim stay, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated.
____________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
Date:22.07.2026 JLSR
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.51 of 2015
Date: 22.07.2026
JLSR