Precedent

Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/16070/2016 of Bodepudi Siva Naga Raja Kumari, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010430262016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO:

HN, J

W.P.No.16070_2016

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010430262016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 16070/2016

Between:

1. BODEPUDI SIVA NAGA RAJA KUMARI,, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO.75-14- 144, HOTEL PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12

2. DARIGETI LAKSHMI,, W/O. KUMAR HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45

YEARS, HOUSEWIFE D.NO.75-14-128, HOTEL PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

3. MEDISETTY LAKSHMI,, W/O. SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,

HOUSEWIFE

D.NO.75-14-128,

HOTEL

PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA

DISTRICT

4. BHUMA RAJYA LAKSHI,, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED

ABOUT 48 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE D.NO.75-14-133 HOTEL PUNNAMI

ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

5. DEVIREDDY RATTAMMA,, W/O. ANANTHA REDDY, HINDU, AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,

HOUSEWIFE

D.NO.75-14-131,

HOTEL

PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA

DISTRICT

6. BORA NOOKA RATNAM,, W/O NARSIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT

50 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGE R/O 75-14-155, HOTEL PUNNAMI

ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRIIHNA DISTRICT

HN, J

W.P.No.16070_2016

7. KATTA PADMA, W/O K. RANGA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC:

DAILY

WAGE

R/O

75-14-174,

HOTEL

PUNNAMI

ROAD,

BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

8. THODISETTY SIVAMMA,, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED 48 YEARS,

OCC: DAILY WAGE R/O 75-14-124, HOTEL PUNNAMI ROAD,

BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

9. GUDIPATI SWARAJYAM,, W/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 44 YEARS,

OCC: DAILY WAGE R/O 75-14-133, HOTEL PUNNAMI ROAD,

BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

10. POTRU MANGAMMA,, W/O YESU BABU, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC:

DAILY

WAGE

R/O

75-14-127,

HOTEL

PUNNAMI

ROAD,

BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

11. JADAPALLI BHARATI,, W/O MOHAN RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC:

DAILY

WAGE

R/O

75-14-100,

HOTEL

PUNNAMI

ROAD,

BHIVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

12. BANDARU MANIKYAM, W/O TRIMURTHULU, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGE R/O 75-14-98A, HOTEL PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

13. SARADHI KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O RANGA RAO, AGED 54 YEARS,

BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

14. POOLADASU VENKATA GNANESWARI,, W/O VENKATA RAMANA, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGE R/O 75-14-98/2, HOTEL

PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12, KRISHNA

DISTRICT

15. SURISETTY RATNAM,, W/O SRINIVASA RAO AGED 44 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGE R/O 75-14-98/1, HOTEL PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

16. SYED MOULALI, S/O BABA VALI, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC: DAILY

WAGE R/O 75-14-49/2, HOTEL PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

17. SHAIK FATIMUNNISA, W/O SUBHANI, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC:

HOUSEWIFE,

R/O

75-14-50,

HOTEL

PUNNAMI

ROAD,

HN, J

W.P.No.16070_2016

BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT

18. SHAIK AMARUNNISA BEGUM @ SK HAYATUNNISA, W/O SHAIK

ABDULLAH BASHA, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC-: HOUSEWIFE R/O 75- 14-47, HOTEL PUNNAMI ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA- 12 KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

REVENUE

DEPARTMENT,

A.P.

SECRETARIAT

BUILDING, HYDERABAD.

3. THE VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS

COMMISSIONER, VIJAWAYADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

5. THE

COMMISSIONER

OF

POLICE,

VIJAYAWADA

CITY,

VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in trying to demolish the Petitioner's houses/ buildings without issuing any notice or following the procedure contemplated under law and without issuing any Land Acquisition Proceedings is arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution and also violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to demolish the petitioners houses/buildings without following the due procedure contemplated under law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 19856 OF 2016

HN, J

W.P.No.16070_2016

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of demolishing the petitioners houses/

buildings

situated

at

Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada, Krishna District pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 1961 OF 2017

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim order granted on 6-5-2016 in W.P.No.16070 of 2016

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. KIRAN TIRUMALASETTI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME (AP)

2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

3. T S VENKATARAMANA

4. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)

5. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC

HN, J

W.P.No.16070_2016

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present writ petition is filed, being aggrieved by the action of the respondents in trying to demolish the petitioner’s property without following the due process of law.

2. While admitting the present writ petition, this Court, vide order dated 06.05.2016, granted status quo to be maintained and the said order shall not be preclude the respondent authorities from taking action by following due process of law, if they want to evict the petitioners from the subject property. Thereafter, the matter has been listed for hearing today.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed off, leaving it open for the respondents to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. If any action has already been initiated prior to the passing of this order, the same shall be governed by law. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:22.07.2026 NKA

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HN, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 16070 of 2016 Date: 22.07.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead