Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/33702/2022 of MARADA TAVITI NAIDU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 21 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 33702/2022 Between: 1. MARADA TAVITI NAIDU, S/O DANAIAH @ DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28.
APHC010551302022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 33702/2022
Between:
1. MARADA TAVITI NAIDU, S/O DANAIAH @ DALINAIDU, AGED
ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28. MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT,
2. MARADA SURYAKALA,, W/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 65
YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. MARADA SAI KUMAR,, S/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 34
YEARS, RIO D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. MARADA MANI KUMAR,, S/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 33
YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. THERLI KANNAMMA, W/O SIMHACHALAM, D/O MARADA
DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. R/O. D.NO.47-157, GOLLAPALLI MANDAL STREET. BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM
DISTRICT.
6. THERLI SANKARA RAO., S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT
44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.47-157, GOLLAPALLI MANDAL STREET.
7. KARRI TIRUPATHI RAO,, S/O. KARRI SANYASI NAIDU, AGED
ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. SANO CHANDILI J K PUR, RAYAGADH DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE.
8. KARRI MEENAKSHI,, W/O.KARRI TIRUPATHI RAO, D/O.
MARADA DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. SANO
CHANDILI J K PUR, RAYAGADH DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE.
9. KARRI KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. KARRI SANYASI NAIDU, AGED
ABOUT 57 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.3-76, KURUKULA STREET,
BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
10. KARRI SUDHEER,, S/O. KARRI KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT
27 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-76, KURUKULA STREET, BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
11. PYDI ADI LAKSHMI,, W/O. LATE MURALI MOHAN. AGED
ABOUT 73 YEARS. RIO. D.NO.3-75. KURUKULA STREET,
12. PYDI PRASANNA LAKSHMI,, W/O. BHOGI SRINIVASA RAO, D/O. LATE MURALI MOHAN. AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. RIO.
KARADA, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
VISAKHAPATNAM,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF
POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM.
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V TOWN POLICE STATION, KANCHARAPALEM,VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT.
7. KAMBAMPATI RAM MOHAN RAO, S/O. RAJA RAO, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
OFFICE
AT
M/S.
LAKSHMI
TECHNOSOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYAT
NAGAR, HYDERABAD.
8. M/S LAKSHMI TECHNOSOLUTIONS PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS
KAMBAMPATI RAM MOHAN RAO, HAVING REGISTERED
OFFICE AT NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYAT NAGAR, HYDERABAD.
9. ECE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT
ECE HOUSE, 28-A, KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI
THE OWNER OF (APEEC) ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICAL
EQUIPMENT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS OFFICER SRI, DEEPAK TIWARI S/O MADAN TIWARI, AGED 46 YEARS.
10. BHUKHAND DEVELOPERS LLP, REP BY ITS AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY, MR. DL RATHI HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE
AT 4, INDIAN EXCHANGE PLACE, 6TH FLOOR, KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL STATE.
11. M/S GALVEN TECHNOSOLUTIONS P LIMITED, REP BY ITS
DIRECTOR, MR. GADDE BABU RAO, HAVING REGISTERED
OFFICE
AT
DOOR
NO.
3-123
ANJANEYAPURAM,
CHIPURUPALLI, VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT.
12. M/S SREE BALAJEE NIRMAN AND ESTATES LLP, REP BY ITS
DESIGNATED
PARTNER
MR.
TADIKONDA
BAPANAYYA
GUPTA, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT DOOR NO. 50-81- 36/1, 1ST FLOOR, SREE BALAJEE CHAMBERS, GURUDWAR
JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 6 in taking action against the 71h respondent for not effecting further registrations, in an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents in Sy No.
57/5, Ac. 1.70 cents in Sy No. 58/1, Ac. 3.52 cents in Sy No. 59/3, Ac.
1.35 cents in Sy No. 59/1, Ac. 0.64 cents in Sy No. 59/2 totaling an extent of Ac. 8-71 cents of Marripalem Village and also an extent of Ac. 1.35
cents in Sy No. 42/4, Ac. 4.22 cents in Sy No. 41 in Kaprada Village totaling an extent of Ac. 14-28 Cents and also in an extent of Ac. 3.45
cents in Sy No. 57, Ac. 01.70 Cents in Sy No. 58, Ac. 5.08 Cents in Sy No. 66, Ac. 0.80 Cents in Sy No. 68 of Marripalem Village and Ac. 4.11
Cents in Sy No. 42 of Kaprada Village totaling an extent of Ac. 15.01
Cents and to investigate into the fake documents created by the respondent Nos. 7 to 12, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 4 not to effect any further registration and respondents 3. 5 and 6 to register a crime against the respondent Nos. 7 to 12 and others and investigate into the same regarding fabrication of false documents and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 & 6 not to effect2 any further registrations by considering the representations dated 18-12-2019, 15-03-2020, made by the Petitioner's properties pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N RAVI PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A CHANDRA SHAKER
2. GP FOR HOME
3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.33702 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners has filed a letter, dated 10.07.2026 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. No order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 22.07.2026 chs
Speaking ✔ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ✔
WRIT PETITION No.33702 of 2022 Dated: 22.07.2026
chs