Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/33702/2022 of MARADA TAVITI NAIDU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 33702/2022 Between: 1. MARADA TAVITI NAIDU, S/O DANAIAH @ DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28.

APHC010551302022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 33702/2022

Between:

1. MARADA TAVITI NAIDU, S/O DANAIAH @ DALINAIDU, AGED

ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28. MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT,

2. MARADA SURYAKALA,, W/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 65

YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

3. MARADA SAI KUMAR,, S/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 34

YEARS, RIO D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

4. MARADA MANI KUMAR,, S/O TAVITI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 33

YEARS, R/O D. NO. 39-8-28, MURALI NAGAR, SECTOR-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

5. THERLI KANNAMMA, W/O SIMHACHALAM, D/O MARADA

DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. R/O. D.NO.47-157, GOLLAPALLI MANDAL STREET. BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM

DISTRICT.

6. THERLI SANKARA RAO., S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT

44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.47-157, GOLLAPALLI MANDAL STREET.

7. KARRI TIRUPATHI RAO,, S/O. KARRI SANYASI NAIDU, AGED

ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. SANO CHANDILI J K PUR, RAYAGADH DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE.

8. KARRI MEENAKSHI,, W/O.KARRI TIRUPATHI RAO, D/O.

MARADA DALINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. SANO

CHANDILI J K PUR, RAYAGADH DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE.

9. KARRI KRISHNA RAO,, S/O. KARRI SANYASI NAIDU, AGED

ABOUT 57 YEARS, RIO. D.NO.3-76, KURUKULA STREET,

BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

10. KARRI SUDHEER,, S/O. KARRI KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT

27 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-76, KURUKULA STREET, BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

11. PYDI ADI LAKSHMI,, W/O. LATE MURALI MOHAN. AGED

ABOUT 73 YEARS. RIO. D.NO.3-75. KURUKULA STREET,

12. PYDI PRASANNA LAKSHMI,, W/O. BHOGI SRINIVASA RAO, D/O. LATE MURALI MOHAN. AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. RIO.

KARADA, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

REVENUE (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR

DISTRICT.

2. THE

DISTRICT

COLLECTOR,

VISAKHAPATNAM,

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF

POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM.

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

5. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V TOWN POLICE STATION, KANCHARAPALEM,VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM

DISTRICT.

7. KAMBAMPATI RAM MOHAN RAO, S/O. RAJA RAO, AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,

OFFICE

AT

M/S.

LAKSHMI

TECHNOSOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYAT

NAGAR, HYDERABAD.

8. M/S LAKSHMI TECHNOSOLUTIONS PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS

KAMBAMPATI RAM MOHAN RAO, HAVING REGISTERED

OFFICE AT NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYAT NAGAR, HYDERABAD.

9. ECE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT

ECE HOUSE, 28-A, KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI

THE OWNER OF (APEEC) ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICAL

EQUIPMENT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS OFFICER SRI, DEEPAK TIWARI S/O MADAN TIWARI, AGED 46 YEARS.

10. BHUKHAND DEVELOPERS LLP, REP BY ITS AUTHORISED

SIGNATORY, MR. DL RATHI HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE

AT 4, INDIAN EXCHANGE PLACE, 6TH FLOOR, KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL STATE.

11. M/S GALVEN TECHNOSOLUTIONS P LIMITED, REP BY ITS

DIRECTOR, MR. GADDE BABU RAO, HAVING REGISTERED

OFFICE

AT

DOOR

NO.

3-123

ANJANEYAPURAM,

CHIPURUPALLI, VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT.

12. M/S SREE BALAJEE NIRMAN AND ESTATES LLP, REP BY ITS

DESIGNATED

PARTNER

MR.

TADIKONDA

BAPANAYYA

GUPTA, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT DOOR NO. 50-81- 36/1, 1ST FLOOR, SREE BALAJEE CHAMBERS, GURUDWAR

JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 6 in taking action against the 71h respondent for not effecting further registrations, in an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents in Sy No.

57/5, Ac. 1.70 cents in Sy No. 58/1, Ac. 3.52 cents in Sy No. 59/3, Ac.

1.35 cents in Sy No. 59/1, Ac. 0.64 cents in Sy No. 59/2 totaling an extent of Ac. 8-71 cents of Marripalem Village and also an extent of Ac. 1.35

cents in Sy No. 42/4, Ac. 4.22 cents in Sy No. 41 in Kaprada Village totaling an extent of Ac. 14-28 Cents and also in an extent of Ac. 3.45

cents in Sy No. 57, Ac. 01.70 Cents in Sy No. 58, Ac. 5.08 Cents in Sy No. 66, Ac. 0.80 Cents in Sy No. 68 of Marripalem Village and Ac. 4.11

Cents in Sy No. 42 of Kaprada Village totaling an extent of Ac. 15.01

Cents and to investigate into the fake documents created by the respondent Nos. 7 to 12, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 4 not to effect any further registration and respondents 3. 5 and 6 to register a crime against the respondent Nos. 7 to 12 and others and investigate into the same regarding fabrication of false documents and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 & 6 not to effect2 any further registrations by considering the representations dated 18-12-2019, 15-03-2020, made by the Petitioner's properties pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. N RAVI PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. A CHANDRA SHAKER

2. GP FOR HOME

3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.33702 of 2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners has filed a letter, dated 10.07.2026 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. No order as to costs.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Date: 22.07.2026 chs

Speaking ✔ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ✔

WRIT PETITION No.33702 of 2022 Dated: 22.07.2026

chs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead