Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1637/2009 of C.J. MANOHAR Vs THE STATE OF A.P. & ANOTHER on 20 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1637/2009 Between: 1. C.J. MANOHAR, S/O. KRUPANANDAM DEVELOPMENT OFFICER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY
APHC010339732009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3560]
TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1637/2009
Between:
1. C.J. MANOHAR, S/O. KRUPANANDAM DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, NELLORE.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF A P ANOTHER, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD.
2. MALLU MURALI REDDY, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAMANA REDDY
RECORD CLERK DIVISIONAL OFFICE, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE
COMPANY LIMITED, BRINDAVANAM, NELLORE.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Petition against the Judgment dt.11.8.2009 made in S.C.No.6/2004 on the file of the court of the Special Judge for the trail of offences under the SCs & STs (POA) Act-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1637/2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired during pendency of the instant criminal revision case.
2. Taking note of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that no order is required to be passed in this matter.
3. Hence, the criminal revision case is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal revision case shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dt.21.07.2026 BV
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No