WP/11591/2022 of K.Shoba Rani, Vs 1State of Andhra Pradesh, on 20 July 2026

APHC010198792022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3457]

TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 11591/2022

Between:

1. K.SHOBA RANI,, W/O K.MARUTHI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC

HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 2-772, MARUTHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI

VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.

2. K.MARUTI,, S/O RAMANJINEYULU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC

BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 2-772,MARUTHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI

VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. 1STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDING,

VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE PLANNING OFFICER, ANANAPURAMU-HINDUPUR URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY

(AHUDA)

D.NO.

11/86,

NEAR

COLLECTOR BUNGLOW, ANANTAPUR,ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

3. THE VICE CHAIRPERSON, ANANTAPURAMU-HINDUPUR URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY,

NEAR

COLLECTOR

BUNGLOW,ANANTAPUR,ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

4. THE

PANCHAYAT

SECRETARY,

GRAM

PANCHAYAT

OFFICE,SOMANDEPALLY, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus Declaring the impugned order proceedings No. 106/2020/AHUDA, dated 14.03.2022

passed

by

the

3rd

respondent

is

as

illegal,

arbitrary,Violation of principle of natural justice and violative of article 14,21, and 300-A of Constitution of Inida and contrary to the AP Metropolitan region and Urban development authorities Act,2016 and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the existing structures in SY

No. 52 in Somandapalli village in an extent of 572.48 Sq.mts by suspending the impugned orders no. 106/2020/AHUDA, dated 14.03.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent passed by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pa IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner/respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. R SUJAN KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. KOMMASANI SRINIVASULA REDDY SC FOR URBAN

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES

2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: